idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Olena Petrenko and Oleksand Zabirko focus on the social and cultural characteristics of sugar beet, stone coal, and the corresponding modes of industrial production. In research literature, natural resources are often associated with particular models of social order and political domination: for example, the cotton production is firmly connected with slavery (e.g. in the American South), while cultivation of grain is often associated with serfdom (e.g. in the Tsarist Empire). Similarly, coal and sugar can be analysed as culture-forming phenomena, which make Ukrainian regions visible, but which arguably anticipate the regional divisions of the country in the Soviet and post-Soviet times.
Being stripped of any political autonomy, in the 19th century Ukraine actively resisted the literary cliché of an underdeveloped southern province of Russian Empire. Particularly since the early 1860s the country experienced an intensive phase of industrialization and modernization, which was mainly connected with two natural resources: sugar beet and stone coal. Both of them profoundly shaped Ukrainian culture, politics, and knowledge structures by introducing modern technologies, investment models, and the new forms of labor organization, thus effectively counter-balancing the established images of Ukraine as rural backwater.
Peasants, merchants and nobles alike were involved in sugar production as well as in coal and steel industry: the natural resources encouraged them to cross social borders and turned them to a new social stratum with its own perceptions of norms and values. With this regional industrialization (to use Sydney Pollard’s term) the economic interests shift from imperial center to the periphery, strengthening both the role of local elites and fostering massive population growth and mobility.
In our presentation we focus on the social and cultural characteristics of sugar beet, stone coal, and the corresponding modes of industrial production. In research literature, resources are often associated with particular models of social order and political domination: for example, the cotton production is firmly connected with slavery (e.g. in the American South), while cultivation of grain is often associated with serfdom (e.g. in the Tsarist Empire). Similarly, in our presentation, we view coal and sugar as culture-forming phenomena, which make Ukrainian regions visible, but which arguably anticipate the regional divisions of the country in the Soviet and post-Soviet times.
Oleksandr Zabirko studied Literature and Linguistics at the University of Luhansk (Ukraine) and the University of Duisburg-Essen (Germany). Currently, he is a researcher at the Slavic Department of the University of Regensburg. His major fields of research are literary models of spatial and political order, contemporary literature(s) from Russia and Ukraine, and fantastic literature in general. His most recent publication is a monograh "Literarische Formen der Geopolitik: Raum- und Ordnungsmodellierung in der russischen und ukrainischen Gegenwartsliteratur" (Literary Forms of Geopolitcs: The Modelling of Spatial and Political Order in Contemporary Russian and Ukrainian Literature).
Moderation: Roman Dubasevych
Hinweise zur Teilnahme:
Termin:
19.08.2021 18:00 - 19:30
Veranstaltungsort:
Stiftung Alfried Krupp Kolleg Greifswald
Martin-Luther-Straße 14
17489 Greifswald
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Deutschland
Zielgruppe:
jedermann
E-Mail-Adresse:
Relevanz:
überregional
Sachgebiete:
Geschichte / Archäologie, Sprache / Literatur, Wirtschaft
Arten:
Seminar / Workshop / Diskussion, Vortrag / Kolloquium / Vorlesung
Eintrag:
06.08.2021
Absender:
Priscilla Primpke
Abteilung:
Alfried Krupp Wissenschaftskolleg Greifswald
Veranstaltung ist kostenlos:
ja
Textsprache:
Englisch
URL dieser Veranstaltung: http://idw-online.de/de/event69380
Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.
Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).
Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.
Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).
Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).
