A new study by New York University and the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics shows that vivid pictorial language has the greatest influence on the aesthetic appeal of poetry. The results improve our understanding of aesthetic preferences in general.
Frankfurt – The impact of poetic language has so far been measured primarily based on objective criteria such as verse and rhythm. However, aesthetic perception also includes subjective assessment. A team of scientists from New York University and the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics has now used poems as an example to identify subjective factors that shape our aesthetic preferences.
The result shows: the more a poem evoked vivid sensory imagery, the more a person liked it. More than 400 participants evaluated poems of the genres Haiku and Sonnet. After reading each poem, they gave an assessment based on four subjective criteria: vividness of the imagery (e.g. "like a spreading fire"), valence (positivity or negativity of the theme), emotional arousal and aesthetic appeal (i.e., how much a person likes the poem).
Edward Vessel, scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, who conducted the study together with Amy Belfi and Gabrielle Starr (New York University), explains: “We suspect that the reason for the strong influence of sensory imagery is its ability to convey meaning. Vivid language gives readers the opportunity to see, hear or feel things through their imagination and thus to experience a quasi-sensual dimension when reading it.” The second strongest influencing factor for the aesthetic appeal of a poem was positive valence. However, the degree of emotional excitement had no strong relationship to the perceived attractiveness.
"Because the influence of intense mental images in our study was so high, we think that this factor may influence our preferences in other aesthetic genres as well", Vessel resumes. Further studies will show to what extent, for example, the attractiveness of pieces of music is linked with the ability to create images in our heads.
Original publication:
Belfi, A. M., Vessel, E. A., & Starr, G. G. (2017). Individual Ratings of Vividness Predict Aesthetic Appeal in Poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance
online publication. doi.org/10.1037/aca0000153
Contact:
Edward Vessel (Co-Author)
Phone: +49 69 8300 479 327
edward.vessel@ae.mpg.de
Andrea Treber (Press & PR)
Phone: +49 69 8300 479 652
presse@ae.mpg.de
About the institute:
The Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics has been founded in 2013 in rankfurt/Main, Germany. It currently employs more than 130 staff members. In a joint effort of researchers from the humanities and the sciences, the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics explores who aesthetically appreciates what, for which reasons and under which situational and historical circumstances, and analyzes the functions of aesthetic practices and preferences for individuals and societies.
The Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics is one of 83 research institutes of the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V., one of Europe’s leading
research organizations.
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars
Cultural sciences, Language / literature, Media and communication sciences, Psychology, Social studies
transregional, national
Miscellaneous scientific news/publications, Research results
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).