idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo

Share on: 
12/12/2018 12:55

Climate policy reduces inequality in lower-income countries

Nadja Gebhardt Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC) gGmbH

    New MCC study examines distributional effects of CO₂ price reform for over 80 countries

    Berlin, 12/12/2018. The public acceptance of a CO₂ tax reform especially depends on its impact on the poorer segments of society. A new study examines the direct and indirect distributional effects of a carbon price reform on fossil fuels for 87 low- and middle-income countries.

    Contrary to existing fears, the new MCC study "Poverty and distributional effects of carbon pricing in low and middle-income countries - A global comparative analysis" shows that the distributional effects especially in lower-income countries would be progressive: richer households would pay a larger share of their income as tax than poorer households. Existing income inequalities would therefore be reduced in the long-term rather than increased. The study covers 75 percent of the world's population and over 90 percent of the poorest people living below US$ 3 a day.

    The effect can mainly be explained by the fact that low-income households spend less on energy, such as gasoline or electricity, in percentage terms. Consumption of food, goods or services, on the other hand, is less significant. However, the study also shows that this effect is reversed in higher-income countries. Above a certain income, the share of energy expenditures in total income decrease and poorer households are more heavily burdened than wealthier ones.

    The authors therefore point to the important role of redistributive policy instruments in mitigating potential social costs. Higher income countries, which tend to have higher emissions, usually have better financial resources and institutional capacity to redistribute revenues. However, also in poorer countries, the social dimension is very important. "A tax of US$ 30 per ton of CO₂ would reduce the disposable income of the lowest income group in most low-income countries by as much as 2.5 percent," says Ira Dorband, lead author of the study. "Part of the revenues generated by the CO₂ tax should be used to cushion the social impact," emphasizes co-author Matthias Kalkuhl.

    The results have important implications for international climate policy. The introduction of a carbon price might actually be easier to manage politically when countries are still at an early development stage. "CO2 pricing would be the right instrument even in today's poor countries to ensure that they do not build a fossil energy industry in the first place," said Jan Steckel, head of the working group Climate and Development and also author of the study.

    About the MCC
    The MCC explores sustainable management and the use of common goods such as global environmental systems and social infrastructures in the context of climate change. Seven working groups conduct research on the topics of economic growth and development, resources and international trade, cities and infrastructure, governance and scientific policy advice. The MCC was jointly founded by the Mercator Foundation and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).

    contact for scientific information:

    Ira Irina Dorband, Jan Steckel

    original publication:

    Ira Irina Dorband, Michael Jakob, Matthias Kalkuhl, Jan Christoph Steckel: Poverty and distributional effects of carbon pricing in low- and middle-income countries – A global comparative analysis, World Development
    Volume 115, March 2019, Pages 246-257,

    more information:

    Criteria of this press release:
    Business and commerce, Journalists, Scientists and scholars
    Economics / business administration, Energy, Environment / ecology, Oceanology / climate, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Research results, Scientific Publications


    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.


    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).


    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).

    Cookies optimize the use of our services. By surfing on you agree to the use of cookies. Data Confidentiality Statement