idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
idw-Abo
Medienpartner:
Wissenschaftsjahr


Share on: 
08/14/2019 11:11

Care less with helmet

Sebastian Hollstein Abteilung Hochschulkommunikation/Bereich Presse und Information
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

    A bike helmet suggests safety – even if the wearer is not sitting on a bike and the helmet cannot fulfil its function. These are the findings of psychologists from the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany in cooperation with the Canadian University of Victoria.

    The significance of some objects is so deeply entrenched in our psyche that we rely on them even when they are not actually helpful. This is the case with a bike helmet. Since our childhood, we learn that we are more protected in traffic when wearing a helmet on our head. The hard, stable headgear suggests safety – even if the wearer is not sitting on a bike and the helmet cannot fulfil its function. These are the findings of psychologists from the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany in cooperation with the Canadian University of Victoria.

    Play a risk game and wear a helmet

    During an experiment, the research team had 40 people play a card game on the computer, in which participants choose between a high-risk and a lower-risk gambling option in each trial. Half of the participants wore a bike helmet under the coverstory that the eye tracker mounted on it measures their eye movements. During the game, the Jena scientists used EEG to observe what was happening in participants’ brains, which led them to an exciting discovery: The so-called "Frontal Midline Theta Power" – the brain activity that characterises the weighing up of alternatives in the decision-making process – was much less pronounced in the helmet wearers. “Therefore, we conclude that the helmet clearly has an impact on decision-making in the risk game. Obviously, participants associate a feeling of safety with wearing the bike helmet,” explains Dr Barbara Schmidt, head of the study. Cognitive control, as psychologists call the neuronal mechanism of weighing things up, is less pronounced when wearing a helmet. “It is possible that this is a priming effect,” said Schmidt. “This means that the significance we associate with a helmet automatically has a cognitive effect that is also measurable in the brain.”

    Influence on risk behaviour

    The helmet and the no-helmet group were comparable concerning their trait anxiety, which is why the discovery is not attributable to a pre-existing group difference.

    Barbara Schmidt continues her research on psychological factors influencing risk behaviour. In an earlier study, she had already clearly identified the "Frontal Midline Theta Power" as an indicator of weighing up alternatives in the decision-making process and thus laid the foundation for her current work. “Investigating neuronal parameters allows us to learn more about why we act the way we do – and how this can be influenced,” says the expert from Jena. “In the present study, we used the very subtle manipulation of wearing a bike helmet. But safety can also be suggested more clearly, for example during hypnosis.”

    This is the connection to another central field of work of the Jena psychologist. Schmidt is investigating the effect of hypnosis. “It is stunning to observe how suggestions can influence brain activity,” she says. “In the hypnotic state, participants are very open to suggestions, for example, the suggestion of a safe place. Wearing a bike helmet can also be interpreted as a suggestion on a subconscious level. The current study shows that even such a subtle intervention significantly affects decision-making processes. Experiments like this help us to understand the mechanisms behind the effect of suggestions on decision-making processes in more depth.”


    Contact for scientific information:

    Dr Barbara Schmidt
    Institute of Psychology of Friedrich Schiller University Jena
    Am Steiger 3, Haus 1,
    07743 Jena, Germany
    Phone: +49 3641 945149
    Email: schmidt.barbara[at]uni-jena.de


    Original publication:

    Barbara Schmidt et al. (2019): Wearing a bike helmet leads to less cognitive control, revealed by lower frontal midline theta power and risk indifference, Psychophysiology, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13458


    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists
    Psychology
    transregional, national
    Research results, Scientific Publications
    English


    The psychologist Dr Barbara Schmidt with bicycle helmet, on which an eyetracker is mounted.


    For download

    x

    The psychologist Dr Barbara Schmidt from the University of Jena demonstrates the experimental setup.


    For download

    x

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).

    Cookies optimize the use of our services. By surfing on idw-online.de you agree to the use of cookies. Data Confidentiality Statement
    Okay