idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
10/15/2019 14:34

Public views on asylum and refugee policies similar across European countries

Melanie Radike Kommunikation
Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW)

    Europeans want to protect refugees, but prefer policies that use limits and conditions, according to an analysis of the attitudes of 12,000 people across European countries towards asylum and refugee policies.

    Researchers at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel) and the European University Institute (EUI) surveyed 12,000 people in eight EU Member States: Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Sweden.

    Within the framework of the MEDAM project (Mercator Dialogue on Asylum and Migration / https://www.medam-migration.eu/en/), the researchers looked at the structure of asylum and refugee policy preferences across six policy dimensions. They studied the regulation of applications for asylum, resettlement of recognised refugees, and the return of unsuccessful asylum seekers to countries where they could face serious harm. Furthermore, they also addressed family reunification for refugees, national and EU decision-making and financial assistance for non-EU countries hosting refugees. The researchers collected insights on how preferences depend on the design of the asylum and refugee policies, in particular on the use of limits and conditions.

    Figure: Effects of changes in policy features on the probability of accepting the overall asylum and refugee policy (percentage points) (see enclosure)

    "Our research clearly illustrates that Europeans want to protect asylum seekers and refugees," says Tobias Stöhr, co-author of the study and senior researcher at the Kiel Institute. "But it is important to them that this happens in a controlled manner, that there are limits and conditions. The remarkable similarities in citizens’ attitudes highlight much greater unity across countries than one would expect considering the public debate and the changes in the political landscape in recent years."

    The researchers found similar preferences for protection with limits and conditions in all eight countries surveyed, including in Hungary, a country with a government well known for its anti-refugee policy positions.

    This type of analysis of asylum and refugee policies is new. There has been plenty of research in recent years on public attitudes to immigration and migrants in general, less on attitudes to asylum seekers and refugees, and near to none on what Europeans think about different dimensions of asylum and refugee policies. This new research can help inform ongoing policy debates on how to reform asylum and refugee policies in Europe and beyond.

    Media Contact:
    Melanie Radike
    Mercator Dialogue on Asylum and Migration (MEDAM)
    T +49 431 8814-329
    melanie.radike@medam-migration.eu

    http://www.medam-migration.eu/

    Mercator Dialogue on Asylum
    and Migration (MEDAM)

    Kiel Institute for the World Economy
    Kiellinie 66 | 24105 Kiel
    T +49 (431) 8814-1
    F +49 (431) 8814-500

    www.ifw-kiel.de


    Contact for scientific information:

    Dr. Tobias Stöhr
    Senior Researcher
    Mercator Dialogue on Asylum and Migration (MEDAM)
    T +49 431 8814-367
    tobias.stoehr@ifw-kiel.de


    Original publication:

    Jeannet, A.-M., E. Ademmer, M. Ruhs, and T. Stöhr. 2019. “What asylum and refugee policies do Europeans want?: Evidence from a cross-national conjoint experiment”. EUI RSCAS Working Paper 2019/73, European University Institute, Florence.
    https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/64384


    Images

    Attachment
    attachment icon Effects of changes in policy features on the probability of accepting the overall asylum and refugee policy (percentage points)

    Criteria of this press release:
    Business and commerce, Journalists, Scientists and scholars
    Economics / business administration, Politics, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Transfer of Science or Research
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).