In nature, organisms often support each other in order to gain an advantage. However, this kind of cooperation contradicts the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin: Why would organisms invest valuable resources to help others? A new study led by Prof. Dr. Christian Kost from the Department of Ecology at the Osnabrueck University now solved this puzzle. The results of the study were published in the scientific journal Current Biology (link: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.100). The research project was performed in collaboration with the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena.
Interactions between two or more organisms, in which all partners involved gain an advantage, are ubiquitous in nature and have played a key role in the evolution of life on Earth. For example, root bacteria fix nitrogen from the atmosphere, thus making it available to plants. In return, the plant supplies its root bacteria with nutritious sugars. However, it is nevertheless costly for both interaction partners to support each other. For example, the provision of sugar requires energy, which is then not available to the plant anymore. From this results the risk of cheating interaction partners that consume the sugar without providing nitrogen in return.
The research team led by Prof. Dr. Christian Kost used bacteria as a model system to study the evolution of mutual cooperation. At the beginning of the experiment, two bacterial strains could only grow when they provided each other with essential amino acids. Over the course of several generations, however, the initial exchange of metabolic byproducts developed into a real cooperation: both partners increased the production of the exchanged amino acids in order to benefit their respective partner. Even though the increased amino acid production enhanced growth when both partners were present, it was extremely costly when individual bacterial strains had to grow without their partner.
The observed changes were caused by the fact that individual bacterial cells had assembled into multicellular clusters. In these cell groups, cooperative mutants were rewarded. The more resources they invested in the growth of other cells, the more nutrients they received in return from their partners.
"This kind of feedback represents a previously unknown mechanism, which promotes the evolution of cooperative interactions between two different organisms," says Prof. Dr. Christian Kost, leader of the study. Although the study was performed with bacteria in a test tube, the mechanism discovered can most likely explain the evolution of cooperation in many different ecological interactions.
Prof. Dr. Christian Kost, Universität Osnabrück
Department of Ecology
School of Biology/ Chemistry
Barbarastraße11, 49076 Osnabrück
Tel.: +49 541 969-2853
E-Mail: christian.kost@uni-osnabrueck.de
Original Publication:
Preussger, D., Giri, S., Muhsal, L., Oña, L., Kost, C. (2020). Reciprocal fitness feedbacks promote the evolution of mutualistic cooperation. Current Biology, DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.100
Positive feedbacks favour cooperative bacteria, which are part of a multicellular group (right). In ...
Department of Ecology
Osnabrueck University
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars
Biology
transregional, national
Research projects, Research results
English
Positive feedbacks favour cooperative bacteria, which are part of a multicellular group (right). In ...
Department of Ecology
Osnabrueck University
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).