Max Planck Researchers and colleagues have resolved a longstanding controversy surrounding the origins of complex life on Earth. In two joint studies they found that ancient steroid molecules extracted from 635-million-year-old rocks aren’t the earliest evidence of animals, but instead derive from common algae.
“We were able to demonstrate that molecules from common algae can be altered by geological processes – leading to steroid molecules which are indistinguishable from those produced by sponge-like animals”, said Dr Lennart van Maldegem, co-lead author of one study. Such fossil steroid molecules were assumed to represent the earliest traces of animal life. The study results are part of van Maldegem’s PhD project conducted in the Max Planck Research Group Organic Paleobiogeochemistry at the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, and at MARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences at the University of Bremen.
“One of the great enigmas in early animal evolution was the lack of a recognisable fossil record even though chemical remains, presumably originating from sponge-like animals, seemed to be abundant,” said Dr. Benjamin Nettersheim, the second co-lead author of the study from the same research group.
“We’ve now been able to solve this mystery. While it holds true that sponges are the only living organism which can produce these steroids, chemical processes can mimic biology and transform common and abundant algae sterols (a steroid sub-group) into “animal” sterols,” said Dr. Ilya Bobrovskiy, lead author of the second study from The Australian National University (ANU) and California Institute of Technology (Caltech). Both research teams were able to reproduce in pyrolysis experiments the “fossil animal” sterols, from either sterols extracted from algae or pure chemicals, thus simulating geological processes.
The researchers involved in the studies, including scientists from University of Strasbourg (CNRS, France) and CSIRO, Australia, underline the importance of their new findings for our understanding of evolution. “Understanding the rise of animals is so incredibly important because it stands at the root of our very own existence” said senior author of the first study Professor Christian Hallmann. “Before we can search for the drivers for the evolution of organismic complexity, we first need to figure out the temporal framework, which has been intensely debated during the past decades”.
“Our results bring the oldest evidence for animals nearly 100 million years closer to the present day”, concludes Benjamin Nettersheim, “which is around 560 million years before present”.
The two complementary studies have been published on November 23 in the scientific journal Nature Ecology and Evolution.
Dr. Benjamin Nettersheim
University of Bremen, IW-3,
28359 Bremen
bnett@bgc-jena.mpg.de
Prof. Christian Hallmann
University of Bremen, IW-3,
28359 Bremen
challmann@bgc-jena.mpg.de
Bobrovskiy, I. et al.
Algal origin of sponge sterane biomarkers negates the oldest evidence for animals in the rock record.
Nat. Ecol. Evol. (2020), DOI:10.1038/s41559-020-01334-7
www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-01334-7
Van Maldegem, L. M., Nettersheim, B.J. et al.
Geological alteration of Precambrian steroids mimics early animal signatures
Nat. Ecol. Evol. (2020), DOI:10.1038/s41559-020-01336-5
www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-01336-5
http://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-01334-7 Publication Bobrovskiy et al
http://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-01336-5 Publication Van Maldegem et al
Expedition with L. van Maldegem into the Grand Canyon, where rock samples were collected that provid ...
Lennart van Maldegem
Christian Hallmann und Lennart van Maldegem discussing chemical analyses.
Tom Pingel
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, all interested persons
Biology, Chemistry, Geosciences
transregional, national
Research results
English
Expedition with L. van Maldegem into the Grand Canyon, where rock samples were collected that provid ...
Lennart van Maldegem
Christian Hallmann und Lennart van Maldegem discussing chemical analyses.
Tom Pingel
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).