idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
White households benefit significantly more from accommodative monetary policy than black households.* This is what researchers from the ECONtribute: Markets & Public Policy Cluster of Excellence at the Universities of Bonn and Cologne found. They evaluated income and wealth data from the United States.
With movements such as Black Lives Matter, thousands around the world drew attention to the persistent inequality between black and white people and called on fellow citizens, but also politicians, to take action. Politicians such as U.S. President Joe Biden stress that monetary policy should play an important role in reducing racial economic inequality. However, the profits from purchase programs and low interest rates, as now during the coronavirus crisis, are primarily benefiting white citizens. This is what Alina Bartscher, Moritz Kuhn and Moritz Schularick, researchers of the ECONtribute Cluster of Excellence at the Universities of Bonn and Cologne, together with Paul Wachtel (New York University), concluded from their analysis of American income and wealth data.
Unemployment declines, wealth gaps grow
The researchers investigated the distributional effects of monetary policy in the U.S.. They analyzed how differently a change in central bank interest rates affects the unemployment rate and assets, for example shares and houses belonging to black and white households.
If the central bank lowers interest rates by one percentage point, the unemployment rate of black households drops by about 0.2 percentage points more than that of white households, and the income gap becomes smaller. The reason: Due to lower interest rates, businesses invest and hire more people, which benefits lower-income households in particular. At the same time, however, wealth inequality is widening, as white U.S. citizens own more financial assets and benefit significantly more from rising asset values. They achieve asset gains of about $25,000 after three years - five times as much as black households.
"The magnitude of these effects surprised us," says Moritz Kuhn, researcher at ECONtribute at the University of Bonn. The employment effects are significantly lower than the wealth effects in the long term. It seems to be the case that with their monetary policy instruments, central banks might not be able to reduce racial income inequality without increasing wealth inequality. In the future, it might be necessary to discuss what role central banks should play in this conflict of interests.
Link to the study: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkdps/ECONtribute_061_2021.pdf
Background Information: Wealth inequality between black and white citizens
Black households in the U.S. earn significantly less on average than white households and own fewer assets. The median assets of a white household are $184,390, nearly nine times that of black U.S. citizens. Their median income is $38,688, about 58 percent of the median income of white households. (Survey of Consumer Finances 2019)
*The division into black and white households is based on participants' own data in the Federal Reserve Board's “Survey of Consumer Finances 2019”, whose data the study adopts.
Funding:
The work received financial support from the ECONtribute Cluster of Excellence at the Universities of Bonn and Cologne, funded by the German Research Foundation as part of the Excellence Strategy of the German Federal and State Governments.
ECONtribute: The only Cluster of Excellence in economics
ECONtribute is the only Cluster of Excellence in economics that is funded by the German Research Foundation and a joint initiative of the Universities of Bonn and Cologne. The Cluster’s research focuses on markets at the interface between business, politics and society. The Cluster aims to advance a new paradigm for the analysis of market failure in light of fundamental societal, technological and economic challenges, such as increasing inequality and political polarization or global financial crises.
Content contact:
Prof. Moritz Kuhn
ECONtribute, University of Bonn
Tel. +49 228 73-62096
mokuhn@uni-bonn.de
Press and communication:
Carolin Jackermeier
ECONtribute
Tel. +49 221 470 7258
jackermeier@wiso.uni-koeln.de
Katrin Tholen
ECONtribute
Tel. +49 228 73 7808
katrin.tholen@uni-bonn.de
Alina K. Bartscher, Moritz Kuhn, Moritz Schularick & Paul Wachtel: Monetary policy and racial inequality. ECONtribute Discussion Paper No. 061
https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkdps/ECONtribute_061_2021.pdf Original publication (ECONtribute Discussion Paper)
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars
Economics / business administration, Social studies
transregional, national
Research results
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).
