idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
02/21/2022 17:11

China business could become a problem for German companies

Mathias Rauck Kommunikation
Kiel Institut für Weltwirtschaft

    German companies are increasingly investing abroad in China. This is particularly true in the manufacturing sector, such as the automotive industry. US companies, on the other hand, are largely staying away from the country. ”German companies are on the path to critical dependence on the goodwill of the Chinese leadership. They serve China's geopolitical claim to power when they transfer their know-how to the country, and they can be squeezed out by domestic firms,” said Rolf J. Langhammer, a trade expert at the Kiel Institute, on the occasion of a recent analysis.

    Since the 1990s, the number of subsidiaries and production facilities of German companies in China has been rising continuously. An analysis by Rolf J. Langhammer, a trade researcher at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, shows that around 7 percent of Germany's total foreign direct investment was recently made in China, equivalent to around 89 billion euros (data basis 2019). In 2000, the figure was only around 1 percent. (R. J. Langhammer: Reluctant US vs Ambitious German Direct Investment in China – the Tale of Two Strategies / https://www.ifw-kiel.de/index.php?id=17025).

    In the manufacturing industry, i.e. in the chemical, mechanical engineering, and automotive sectors, foreign direct investment in China rose from around a good 2 percent in 2000 to as much as 14 percent recently (61 billion euros). The automotive industry alone invested 24 percent of its foreign assets in China (26 billion euros).

    By contrast, the USA, the world's largest foreign investor, has so far avoided this growth region, focusing instead on investments in Europe. In 2020, only around 2 percent of all foreign direct investment flowed to China (110 billion euros). For manufacturing companies, the figure was a good 6 percent (54 billion euros). In 2000, the share of US foreign investment in China was on a par with that of Germany, totaling around 1 percent and 2 percent in the manufacturing sector, respectively.

    ”The reluctance of US companies is all the more astonishing because China has been one of the most dynamically growing regions of the world for many years, offering companies an extremely lucrative sales market. Moreover, in recent years China has also been gradually granting foreign firms access to the services sector, where US firms are world leaders. Quite obviously, the concerns about being exploited by China for knowledge transfer or spying on sensitive and security-relevant information are too big,” says Langhammer.

    The US implements investment controls to protect national security not only against foreign companies seeking to establish operations in the US. It also regulates the expansion of US companies outside the US to ensure that sensitive information cannot fall into foreign hands as a result. Germany, on the other hand, only regulates the activities of foreign companies at home through its Foreign Trade Act, not the investments of domestic companies abroad, such as in China. China is pushing foreign companies to supply its own market less through trade and more through foreign subsidiaries.

    ”China's goal is to become less dependent on foreign countries, especially its systemic rival, the United States, and to be able to produce key technologies itself. To achieve this, the country needs know-how that it does not yet have. Foreign investors must realize that they are supposed to serve this goal and will be replaced by domestic suppliers as soon as the latter have the necessary technological expertise,” says Langhammer. ”German companies, especially in the automotive industry, have made profits in China for many years, and now their dependence on the Chinese market may become a problem. They have provided Chinese companies with the necessary know-how to be replaced by them in the future, thus helping China to gain a more powerful negotiating position in the geopolitical competition.”

    Read Kiel Policy Brief: R. J. Langhammer: Reluctant US vs Ambitious German Direct Investment in China – the Tale of Two Strategies / https://www.ifw-kiel.de/index.php?id=17025

    Media Contact:
    Mathias Rauck
    Press Officer
    T +49 431 8814-411
    mathias.rauck@ifw-kiel.de

    Kiel Institute for theWorld Economy
    Kiellinie 66 | 24105 Kiel | Germany
    T +49 431 8814-774
    F +49 431 8814-500
    www.ifw-kiel.de


    Contact for scientific information:

    Prof. Dr. Rolf J. Langhammer
    T +49 431 8814-203
    rolf.langhammer@ifw-kiel.de


    Images

    Figure_Foreign direct investment in China
    Figure_Foreign direct investment in China


    Criteria of this press release:
    Business and commerce, Journalists, Scientists and scholars
    Economics / business administration, Politics, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Transfer of Science or Research
    English


     

    Figure_Foreign direct investment in China


    For download

    x

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).