idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
What about the willingness to share privately generated electricity during a prolonged power outage? Researchers from various departments at the TU Darmstadt at the LOEWE center emergenCITY have investigated this. The recently published study yields surprising results.
An increasing number of natural disasters, the rising share of renewable energies and the current gas crisis – these factors are putting a strain on the electricity networks. Experts are increasingly concerned about the stability of the electricity networks and point to an increased risk of large-scale, long-lasting power outages, so-called blackouts. These can have serious consequences for the population: Communication networks, water supply and health care systems could collapse.
In the event of a blackout, however, it would be much less difficult for those have their own photovoltaic system and also have the technical capability to use it independently of the grid, for example by means of electricity storage. This way, at least their own household can still be supplied with electricity.
Due to the constantly growing number of private photovoltaic systems, of which more and more can be used separately from the grid, completely new possibilities for an emergency power supply arise: With the help of private systems, it would theoretically be possible to maintain a basic supply of at least the most important infrastructures. This is because, in combination with battery storage, they could serve as a decentralized energy source. An approach with great potential – but only if the owners decide to share the produced electricity and not to consume it themselves.
Professor Carolin Bock and Konstantin Kurz from the Department of Law and Economics as well as Professor Michele Knodt and Anna Stöckl from the Department of History and Social Sciences at TU Darmstadt, who are conducting joint research in the LOEWE Center emergenCITY, have addressed this topic and investigated how people deal with the social dilemma: Would they share electricity from their private photovoltaic system with neighbors and friends during a prolonged blackout , accepting cutbacks in their own supply? Or would they prefer to consume the electricity themselves to enjoy warm food, light, and a charged smartphone?
The research article recently published in the Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, "A Friend in Need is a Friend Indeed? Analysis of the Willingness to Share Self-Produced Electricity During a Long-lasting Power Outage" now provides findings that offer a ray of hope in the face of a bleak outlook.
To better understand the incentives and motivations that lead to cooperative behavior during a blackout, the researchers surveyed 80 households in Germany about their willingness to share with various recipient groups. The researchers assumed that both structural solutions such as rewards in the form of increased feed-in tariffs and individual motives such as empathy-elicited altruism increase the willingness to share. The surprising result: while empathy and altruistic values inspired sharing, especially toward the recipient groups of relatives and friends as well as the critical infrastructure, structural incentives, such as higher financial rewards, even proved to be a hindrance in some cases, depending on the social value orientation of the givers.
We like to share – especially if the person in need is close to us or if it involves important infrastructure that is urgently needed during a crisis. However, we don't want to know anything about money in the altruistic act. "Politicians should therefore be particularly careful with the tempting idea of simply increasing feed-in tariffs in the event of power outages," warns Professor Bock. This could turn what was originally a social decision into a business decision – with negative effects on the willingness to cooperate. Instead, the researchers recommend encouraging the already pronounced prosocial behavior even further. This is because both the degree of connectedness and the perceived responsibility are significant predictors of cooperative behavior in emergency situations such as during a blackout.
While on the technical side, many private photovoltaic systems would still require modifications to enable them to feed electricity into the grid in the event of a crisis, the researchers see the great potential of decentralized energy sources confirmed: From a social perspective, the approach of using private photovoltaic systems in the event of a crisis is an immediate and feasible measure for improving local energy resilience. This offers exciting starting points for an efficient as well as simple promotion of the resilience of our energy supply, for example through state support for investments in self-sufficient photovoltaic systems. At the same time, the strong social ties that often already exist could be further extended by fostering a community identity. This can create resilient communities that hold together even in a blackout.
LOEWE Center emergenCITY
Started in 2020, the LOEWE center emergenCITY is researching resilient infrastructures of digital cities that can withstand crises and disasters. emergenCITY is organized as an interdisciplinary and multi-site cooperation led by Technische Universität Darmstadt, Universität Kassel, and Philipps-Universität Marburg as well as the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance and the City of Darmstadt. The center partners with several other institutions from academia, industry, and public administration.
Konstantin Kurz, Carolin Bock, Michèle Knodt & Anna Stöckl: "A Friend in Need Is a Friend Indeed? Analysis of the Willingness to Share Self-Produced Electricity During a Long-lasting Power Outage" Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research volume 74, 727–761 (2022)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-022-00148-6
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars
Economics / business administration, Energy, Politics, Psychology, Social studies
transregional, national
Research results, Scientific Publications
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).
