idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Cash grants appear to be more promising than matching grants, especially if survival of small businesses rather than innovation is the key objective in fragile political contexts. This is the result of a study conducted by economists from the University of Passau and the World Bank in Washington D.C. and Burkina Faso.
An unresolved policy question is whether support for small firms in form of grants should be flexible (“cash grant”), and its exact use left to the discretion of the beneficiary or whether it should be earmarked and accompanied by strict procurement rules and possibly an own contribution (“matching grant”). To shed light on that question, researchers from the University of Passau and the World Bank conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Burkina Faso to compare 400 firms that received flexible cash grants with 400 firms that received subsidies earmarked for investments in individualized technical training and consulting services. The study concludes: cash grant score higher in all categories and are also more cost-efficient.
“Beneficiaries of cash grants showed higher survival rates, improved business practices, more formalization, and more innovation activities compared to beneficiaries of matching grants and firms in the control group”, explains Professor Michael Grimm, holder of the Chair of Development Economics at the University of Passau. He is the lead author of the study, which was published in October in the renowned “Journal of Development Economics” under the title “Supporting small firms in a fragile context: Comparing matching and cash grants in Burkina Faso”.
Together with his co-authors Dr Sidiki Soubeiga, former doctoral student at the University of Passau and now consultant at the World Bank in Burkina Faso, and Dr Michael Weber, senior economist at the World Bank in Washington D.C., Professor Grimm conducted a randomised controlled experiment in Burkina Faso, to assess the medium-term impacts and cost-effectiveness of two innovative interventions to enhance firm growth and job creation in a fragile and rural setting. Cash grants can be used for any business purpose. Matching grants are earmarked for business development services (BDS), such as technical training and expert consulting.
Results at a glance
Two years after implementing the interventions the research team observed the following effects:
• Across all outcomes, beneficiaries of cash grants outperformed those receiving matching grants.
• Most cash grant beneficiaries chose to spend the grant on capital goods, inputs, and livestock rather than BDSs. Overall, there was little evidence of fraud or misuse, even for the more flexible cash grants.
• Cash grant beneficiaries increased investment, saw greater growth in capital stocks, and were more resilient to the COVID-19 crisis, which could boost profits, sales, and employment in the longer term.
• However, neither cash nor matching grants significantly increased profits, sales, and employment relative to the control group.
• Cash grants are more cost-effective to implement. Including the grants, the cost per beneficiary was USD 6,658 for recipients of cash grants and USD 7,135 for recipients of matching grants.
The economists conducted the study as a randomised controlled trial in Burkina Faso from 2019 to 2022, in partnership with the local Maison de l’Entreprise du Burkina Faso (MEBF) and Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA), which fielded the surveys. Participating firms were eligible for up to USD 8,000 either in the form of cash or matching grants. Procurement rules were stricter for matching grants to prevent misuse. In order to qualify for a grant, firms had to take part in a business plan competition. On behalf of MEBF experts selected 1,200 entrepreneurs from 2,279 applications, who were randomly allocated into two treatment arms (cash grants or matching grants) and a control group.
“Cash grants appear to be the more promising alternative, especially if survival of the firm rather than innovation is the key objective,” says Professor Grimm, summarising the results. “A flexible cash intervention therefore can be a worthwhile policy option in other fragile contexts with weak institutions and a low-skilled workforce.” According to the researchers, this is the first study to compare matching grants with cash grants based on a randomised field experiment in a fragile context.
Professor Michael Grimm
Chair of Development Economics
Innstraße 29
94032 Passau
michael.grimm@uni-passau.de
M. Grimm, S. Soubeiga and M. Weber (2024), Supporting small firms in a fragile context: Comparing matching and cash grants in Burkina Faso, Journal of Development Economics, 171, 103344.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387824000932?via%3Dihub
https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/developmenttalk/cash-or-matching-grants--medium-t... Blog post by the economists on worldbank.org
Michael Grimm, Professor of Development Economics.
University of Passau
University of Passau
Criteria of this press release:
Business and commerce, Journalists, Scientists and scholars, Students
Economics / business administration, Politics
transregional, national
Research results, Scientific Publications
English
Michael Grimm, Professor of Development Economics.
University of Passau
University of Passau
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).
