idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
12/09/2024 07:30

Providing performance information of peers as a management tool?

Lisa Wolf PR Management
Kühne Logistics University - Wissenschaftliche Hochschule für Logistik und Unternehmensführung

    More and more companies are gathering performance data on their employees and sharing that data among their staff. Their hope: that those employees who receive feedback that their own performance is lower than their colleagues’ will be more motivated to change the way they work and are more motivated to explore. But is this approach truly effective and sensible? In a new study, experts from KLU (Kühne Logistics University), the HEC Paris, and the University of Southern Denmark take a closer look.

    In an experiment, participants were provided information on their colleagues’ performance. Some received information from one other person that normally performed above or below average. The point of this additional information is not to rank employees, or to punish or reward them. Rather, the idea is to give people in the experiment the chance to assess their own performance in comparison to others and make better choices on that basis.

    “The assumption is that especially those employees who aren’t currently performing as well will reexamine how they go about their work – and ideally, find new and creative solutions,” says Prof. Franziska Lauenstein. “But that’s not always what happens. Our study shows that, when this information is provided, the majority of participants keep doing things the way they always have. If you’re looking to boost efficiency, that can be a good thing; if you’re after future-proof solutions instead, it can be counterproductive.”

    Positive self-image influences responses to feedback

    Why do the majority continue with business as usual? On the one hand, those participants whose performance is better than that of their peers have very little incentive to change strategies. On the other, those participants who receive negative feedback often ignore it or reinterpret it into something positive. This response depends on whether or not they tend to have a positive self-image and to engage in “self-enhancement.”

    “Individuals who tend to self-enhance look for positive affirmations of their self-image and ignore or reinterpret negative feedback,” Lauenstein explains. “For instance, they focus on the fact that their own performance improved, even if it was poor compared to others. In many real-world situations, this can be helpful.”

    Creating the right framework conditions

    Is information on coworkers’ performance poorly suited as a motivating management tool? “Providing performance data offers staff an excellent opportunity to make better choices on their own. But it’s important to create the right setting first,” says Lauenstein.
    For instance, when being informed that other employees are outperforming them can endanger their own self-image, employees shy away from this comparison. And those employees already delivering good performance feel confident in continuing with business as usual, since they’re doing better than their peers. “As a result, this can even lead to less exploration of new ideas throughout the company as a whole,” says Lauenstein.

    “As such, companies have to ensure that the information can be seen as an opportunity for staff to learn from others and improve their own performance. Then it can produce positive effects and foster innovation.” For example, employees should receive this information directly, not in front of others. In addition, there should be little competition in the working environment.

    “Then providing performance data can be a helpful tool, particularly for companies that want to give their employees information as the basis for making their own decisions, rather than micro-managing them or giving strict instructions,” Lauenstein concludes.

    The complete study will soon be released under the following title:
    Franziska Lauenstein; Daniel Newark Oliver Baumann, (2024) How Mixed Performance Feedback Shapes Exploration: The Moderating Role of Self-Enhancement. Organization Science 0(ja).

    KLU, Kühne Logistics University, is a leading, state-recognized, international university based in Hamburg, Germany, with a second campus planned in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. It offers English-taught Bachelor’s, Master’s, MBA, PhD, and Executive Education programs in business and management, data science and analytics, and notably, logistics and supply chain management.

    Named after its founder and benefactor Klaus-Michael Kühne, one of Germany’s most successful business leaders, KLU is committed to empowering contemporary leaders with a strong operations mindset. Accordingly, its teaching and research activities blend academic excellence with a hands-on approach to ensure real-world applicability. Emphasizing digital transformation, entrepreneurship, and sustainability, KLU shapes leaders to drive responsible and sustainable change globally.

    Students benefit from an exceptional professor-to-student ratio of approximately 1 to 12, affording them individual support from world-class, highly research-active professors. They can gain additional experience through integrated internships, participation in student and sports clubs, and international exchanges with prestigious business schools and universities. Tailored career coaching and partnerships with top companies ensure a successful career path.


    Original publication:

    https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15676


    Images

    KLU Building
    KLU Building
    Christin Schwarzer
    KLU/Christin Schwarzer


    Criteria of this press release:
    Business and commerce, Journalists, Scientists and scholars
    Economics / business administration, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Research results, Scientific Publications
    English


     

    KLU Building


    For download

    x

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).