idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
10/22/2025 11:01

Europe Chooses Solar Power and Import Independence

Sabine Letz RIFS Presse und Kommunikation
Forschungsinstitut für Nachhaltigkeit Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam

    Renewable energy is today the cheapest source of electricity available. In order to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, the share of renewables must be expanded to 100 per cent by 2030. However, this expansion comes with an increase in land-use, leading to rising public opposition. How can citizens’ preferences inform the planning of energy systems? This question was addressed by a team of researchers from ETH Zurich, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg and the Research Institute for Sustainability (RIFS) at GFZ Helmholtz Centre. Researchers developed an approach that enables the evaluation of energy plans not only in terms of technical and economic aspects, but also citizen preferences.

    The study draws on data from decision-making experiments in four European countries with energy system models. By combining preference data on how electricity systems should be designed with techno-economic scenarios at national and sub-national level, the new methodology makes it possible to predict which energy system people in Europe would choose.
    "Although energy system models are becoming more sophisticated, more detailed and show how functioning and cost-effective renewable energy systems can be built, they run the risk of generating irrelevant results as they ignore the social factors that constrain and drive on-the-ground development,” explains lead author Tim Tröndle (ETH Zurich). Social scientific studies show how acceptance and opposition develop, but ignore whether the sum of all measures taken to accommodate societal wishes and needs makes the resulting energy system technically and economically infeasible.

    Preference for solar power and decentralised energy Systems

    "It was interesting, for example, that people tended to favour solar over wind power, even if it wasn't the first choice from a cost perspective," says Professor Johan Lilliestam from the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg. At the same time, Europeans are not only seeking low energy costs, but also a more decentralised energy system with less wind power, more solar energy and fewer imports. The authors argue that this shift has likely been reinforced by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    However, in many places other factors also played a role. "One of these is the concentration of generation and transmission infrastructure, which we can visualise quite accurately thanks to our analysis," explains Tröndle. In the map below, for example, the most cost-effective transmission corridor in Hungary and Romania is depicted in dark blue, however this option is strongly opposed by citizens.

    “This shows that integrating citizens’ preferences into energy system modelling can lead to more realistic and socially acceptable results," says study author Franziska Mey from RIFS. The researchers conclude that incorporating social data can fundamentally alter the outcomes of energy modelling, and that political decision-making processes can benefit from such analyses.

    1. "Firstly, our study shows that citizens' preferences can be incorporated into energy models, resulting in scenarios that are both technically feasible and socially favoured," says Tröndle. “Political decision-makers should therefore establish procedures in which citizens' preferences - for example through decision-making experiments or representative surveys - are incorporated as input variables in national and regional energy planning tools."
    2. Secondly, the study makes it clear that people do not necessarily prefer cost-optimised solutions. This means that political decisions should not be based solely on economic criteria, but must take into account the preferences of the population in order to ensure acceptance and support.

    The study is intended to help bridge the gap between technical modelling and social reality by providing the tools that will enable political decision-makers to develop socially viable energy scenarios. This could help to make the transition to a decarbonized electricity supply more democratic, more efficient and less conflictual.


    Contact for scientific information:

    Dr. Tim Tröndle
    Professur Klimaschutz & -anpassung
    ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Systems Science
    Phone: +41 44 632 71 87
    Mail: tim.troendle@usys.ethz.ch

    Dr. Franziska Mey
    Research Group Lead
    Research Institute for Sustainability (RIFS) at GFZ
    Phone: +49 331 6264-22454
    Mail: franziska.mey@rifs-potsdam.de

    Prof. Johan Lilliestam
    Lehrstuhl für Politik der Nachhaltigkeitswende
    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)
    Phone: +49 911 530 295 229
    Mail: johan.lilliestam@fau.de


    Original publication:

    Tim Tröndle, Franziska Mey and Johan Lilliestam: Socially preferable and technically feasible: European citizens choose solar power and import independence over lower Costs, Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 129, November 2025, 104364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104364


    More information:

    https://www.rifs-potsdam.de/en/news/europe-chooses-solar-power-and-import-indepe...
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104364


    Images

    Where citizens would choose a scenario based on net regional self-sufficiency over the least-cost scenario. Colours show choice probabilities for the regional net self-sufficiency scenario.
    Where citizens would choose a scenario based on net regional self-sufficiency over the least-cost sc ...
    Source: Tim Tröndle
    Copyright: Tim Tröndle


    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists, all interested persons
    Energy, Environment / ecology, Politics, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Cooperation agreements, Research results
    English


     

    Where citizens would choose a scenario based on net regional self-sufficiency over the least-cost scenario. Colours show choice probabilities for the regional net self-sufficiency scenario.


    For download

    x

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).