17 November 2025 / Brussels/Kiel. Today, an international group of leading marine scientists, including Prof. Dr Andreas Oschlies from the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, launched a new European Marine Board (EMB) Future Science Brief on marine Carbon Dioxide Removal. The authors emphasise that reducing greenhouse gas emissions must remain the absolute priority – CDR approaches can only complement these efforts, not replace them.
Methods for actively removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, known as Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), are currently the subject of extensive research, including marine CDR (mCDR) methods. These approaches aim to compensate for hard-to-abate residual emissions and, in the longer term, contribute to achieving the climate targets set out in the Paris Agreement.
To ensure that such methods can be applied safely and transparently in future, reliable Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) systems will be essential. MRV frameworks must track how much CO2 is removed, how long it is stored, and any potential environmental impacts.
This is the central message of the European Marine Board’s Future Science Brief No. 13, ‘Monitoring, Reporting and Verification for Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal’, which was published in Brussels today. Thirteen researchers from an international working group contributed to the document, including Prof. Dr Andreas Oschlies, Head of the Biogeochemical Modelling Research Unit at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel.
“No mCDR method currently has a sufficiently robust and comprehensive MRV system in place,” says Dr Helene Muri, a senior researcher at the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), who co-led the working group together with Dr Olivier Sulpis from CEREGE – Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, IRD. “This means that efficient and safe implementation cannot be ensured at present.”
Knowledge gaps and need for action
The EMB Future Science Brief highlights key research gaps. For example, it is not yet fully understood how different mCDR methods affect ocean processes, or how long the captured carbon would remain stored. These uncertainties currently complicate the evaluation of potential risks and benefits.
“Responsible climate policy requires reliable data,” says Prof. Dr Andreas Oschlies from GEOMAR. According to the report, this particularly applies to observational data, modelling approaches and technological innovations that can underpin the development of science-based MRV systems. Oschlies adds: “Findings from the German research mission CDRmare – from laboratory studies, mesocosm experiments and modelling – suggest that several marine CDR methods may hold promise. However, we can only make responsible decisions about if and where they can be applied once we fully understand their effectiveness and possible side effects in the marine environment.”
Clear rules and global responsibility
As well as highlighting scientific challenges, the report also draws attention to governance issues. Currently, there are no dedicated legal or institutional frameworks dedicated to MRV systems relating to marine CDR.
“We need harmonised and binding rules that provide transparency and overcome the current fragmentation of MRV systems,” says Helene Muri. Only then can future CO₂ removal activities in the ocean be implemented in a responsible manner that protects marine ecosystems.
At the same time, the scientists stress that reducing greenhouse gas emissions rapidly and substantially must remain the top priority. Marine CDR can support this process, but it cannot replace it.
About: European Marine Board (EMB)
The European Marine Board (EMB) is a leading European think-tank on marine science policy. Its network brings together more than 10,000 researchers from national oceanographic institutes, research funding agencies and associations of universities across Europe. The EMB aims to develop shared scientific priorities, strengthen the dialogue between science and policy, and provide strategic guidance for the future of European marine research.
https://www.geomar.de/n10089 – images for download
http://www.marineboard.eu The European Marine Board
https://www.marineboard.eu/sites/marineboard.eu/files/public/New_website/Foresig... Future Science Brief on marine Carbon Dioxide Removal
https://cdrmare.de/en/ CDRmare Research Mission of the German Marine Research Alliance (DAM)
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists
Biology, Chemistry, Environment / ecology, Geosciences, Oceanology / climate
transregional, national
Cooperation agreements, Scientific Publications
English

You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).