idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
03/16/2026 14:00

Why Some People Change Only When Enough Others Do

Melanie Nyfeler Kommunikation
Universität Zürich

    From climate action to public health, even widely supported solutions often fail to gain momentum. Researchers at the University of Zurich now show why: people differ in how much social support they need before changing their behavior. Measuring these individual “tipping points” could help make social change campaigns more effective.

    Why do widely supported solutions to major problems, such as climate change, so often struggle to gain real traction? A new study suggests that part of the answer lies in understanding why people resist change, and how the combination of their preferences and social networks can help overcome that resistance.

    A study published in Nature Human Behaviour by researchers at the University of Zurich (UZH) shows that it is possible to measure people’s individual thresholds for change. This threshold value describes how much social support a person needs before adopting a new behavior.

    Personal thresholds vary widely

    The research brings together two fields that have traditionally studied social change separately: behavioral science, which examines what drives individual decisions, and complexity science, which looks at how behaviors spread through complex social networks.

    “People don’t change in isolation,” says Manuel S. Mariani from the Department of Business Administration. “They respond to what others around them are doing, but the amount of encouragement they need varies from person to person. Some people will try a new idea the moment they hear about it. Others wait until everyone else is doing it.”

    Turning choices into measurable tipping points

    The researchers adapted tools commonly employed in marketing research. In survey experiments, participants repeatedly chose between options such as energy policies or messaging apps while seeing different levels of social support for each one.

    Based on these choices, the team estimated each participant’s personal threshold for change, i.e., how much social backing was needed before they were likely to support a new energy policy or adopt a new app. “This approach lets us infer individual tipping points directly from observed decisions, rather than guessing them,” says business scientist Radu Tanase.

    Combining thresholds with network structure

    The researchers then tested whether this information could improve real-world interventions. Using extensive simulations on real social networks, they compared different strategies for “seeding” change. One approach, for instance, encouraged a small number of people to adopt a new behavior first, with the aim of creating a critical mass of early adopters and triggering broader uptake.

    They found that strategies combining two types of information – social network structure and individual thresholds for change – consistently outperformed approaches based on only one of these factors.

    For instance, in scenarios where individuals with high thresholds were less responsive to targeting, the most effective strategy was to target those individuals connected to many others who were already close to adopting the change. In settings where targeting is costly, as in online influencer marketing, the best results came from more sophisticated algorithms that took both network structure and individual thresholds into account.

    More effective interventions for social change

    These findings are particularly relevant to public policy, climate action and public health. “By identifying who needs just a little nudge and how influence spreads through social networks, interventions can be designed to have a much larger impact,” notes René Algesheimer, Professor of Marketing for Social Impact at the Department of Business Administration.

    Although the experiments relied on simplified social signals and real-life situations involve more complex social dynamics, this study marks a promising step toward more effective social change interventions. The authors comment: “Our study suggests that understanding who is ready to change – and who is not – may be just as important as understanding the networks they belong to.”


    Contact for scientific information:

    Contact:
    Dr. Manuel Sebastian Mariani
    Research Group Leader
    URPP Social Networks
    University of Zurich
    +41 44 634 29 18
    manuel.mariani@business.uzh.ch


    Original publication:

    Literature:
    Radu Tanase, René Algesheimer, and Manuel S. Mariani. Integrating behavioral experimental findings into dynamical models to inform social change interventions. Nature Human Behaviour, 16 March 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-026-02417-4.


    Images

    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists
    Media and communication sciences, Philosophy / ethics, Psychology, Social studies, Teaching / education
    transregional, national
    Research results, Transfer of Science or Research
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).