idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Grafik: idw-Logo

idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft

Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
02/16/2017 16:38

Despite attacks on news media - high expectations on journalistic accuracy from the public

Christina Knowles, Karlstad University Kommunikationsavdelningen / Communications Department
Schwedischer Forschungsrat - The Swedish Research Council

    No time is wasted when news is produced and published on the net. This means increased risk of errors, but also that errors can be corrected. Articles can be altered within minutes and the time of the latest change is displayed. However, research at Karlstad University, Sweden, shows that the public has high expectations on the accuracy of news from the start and has little patience with errors.

    The Swedish study measured Swedes' attitudes to errors and corrections of news in digital media, and if attitudes were affected by the gravity and frequency of the inaccuracies and to what degree digital media users had trust in the media in general, in relation to factors such as age, gender, educational level and media habits. Users were also asked to state if they accessed the news via their mobile phone, computer or tablet.
    "People expect things to be correct from the start. Journalists should report accurate and relevant news and whether this is done digitally or speedily makes no difference. Even when journalism is attacked and false news spread, the public has high and traditional expectations on the news media," says Michael Karlsson, researcher in media and communication studies at Karlstad University.

    The users' background and media habits do not affect their attitudes to errors and corrections in any significant degree, according to the study. But there is one difference: those who already had a greater trust in the media than the average user is the group that appreciated corrections of the news on the net the most.
    The researchers used Kantar Sifo (formerly TNS, Sifo) and a web-based questionnaire was sent to nearly 8 000 persons in Sweden aged 16 and older. More than 2 000 persons responded, half of them women. A majority of the respondents (60%) had a negative attitude to inaccuracies in news reporting.

    Correct rather than fast news
    The gravity of an inaccuracy affected the respondents’ tolerance. More than half of the respondents (around 66%) accepted minor errors that were quickly corrected, and were positive to transparency to errors, that is, when journalists corrected mistakes and noted this in the margin. Users were negative to errors not being corrected and nearly all (90%) disapproved of grave errors.

    For those who already had great trust in the media, correcting mistakes and openly stating this could actually strengthen the trust further. But the differences are small and corrections do not compensate for bad journalism.

    “It is more important now than it has been for a long time that journalists do not cut corners, particularly in view of Trumps' gestures against the media and a debate about alternative facts. Transparency carries little importance for the general public and for journalistic credibility. An additional example of resentment of false news is that Facebook is now launching a new way of handling erroneous news spreading via the site,” says Michael Karlsson.

    The study is reported in the article ”Do Not Stand Corrected: Transparency and Users’ Attitudes to Inaccurate News and Corrections in Online Journalism”, published in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly.
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1077699016654680


    Images

    Michael Karlsson
    Michael Karlsson


    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists
    Cultural sciences, Media and communication sciences, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Research results, Scientific Publications
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).