idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Grafik: idw-Logo

idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft

Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
07/05/2017 10:26

Some Questions Are More Effective Than Others

Nicole Siller Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung

    What kind of questions do we need to ask to get the information we are looking for? And when do children learn to recognize which questions are more informative? Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development have investigated the questioning strategies of children aged three to five years. Their findings have been published in Developmental Psychology.

    One way to learn about the world is by asking questions. But when and how do we learn to ask good questions? Previous research has shown that the ability to ask effective questions and to efficiently explore the environment starts to develop at age four, continuing on into adulthood. As a result, primary school children aged of seven to ten still have difficulty coming up with effective questions from scratch.

    However, a recent study conducted by the Max Planck Research Group iSearch | Information Search, Ecological and Active Learning Research with Children shows that four-year-olds are already able to tell which of two questions is more informative and thus more effective. In other words, they have the cognitive ability to tell which question will get them closer to the answer they are looking for. “Our findings suggest that three- and four-year-olds already have the necessary basic skills to develop successful and adaptive questioning strategies,” says Azzurra Ruggeri, head of the iSearch Research Group.

    A total of 268 children aged between three and five years old took part in the study, with each child participating in just one of the study’s four experiments. In all experiments, the children were shown a storybook about a monster called Toma, who has been late for school several days in a row. The children were also shown the reasons for Toma being late—for example, that she had overslept, been watching TV, or not been able to find her jacket.

    In the actual test situation, the children then saw two of Toma’s friends. Each friend asked a question to find out why Toma was late to school again: One friend asked a question covering various possible reasons—for example, the question “Toma, were you late because you couldn’t find something?” covered the possibilities that Toma was late because she could not find her backpack, her jacket, or her shoes. The other friend asked a question that tested one specific hypothesis, such as “Toma, were you late because you couldn’t find your jacket?” The children were asked to select the monster they thought would be the first to find out why Toma was late for school again—that is, the one who asked the most informative question. Across the four experiments, the researchers varied the frequency and likelihoods of the reasons presented for Toma being late.

    Whereas previous studies have concluded that children prefer questions testing one specific hypothesis, these new findings show that preschoolers are already able to choose their questions strategically: They select different kinds of question depending on how effective they are in the given situation, choosing the most informative one—the one that leads to the correct answer in fewer steps.

    “In future studies, we would like to find out how we can help preschoolers to formulate effective questions from scratch, and which rules of thumb they use to assess the effectiveness of given or self-generated questions,” says Azzurra Ruggeri.

    -----

    Original Publication
    Ruggeri, A., Sim, Z. L., & Xu, F. (2017). Why is Toma late to school again? Preschoolers identify the most informative questions. Developmental Psychology. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1037/dev0000340


    More information:

    https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/en/media/2017/07/some-questions-are-more-effectiv...


    Images

    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists
    Psychology
    transregional, national
    Research results
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).