idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Grafik: idw-Logo

idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft

Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
11/29/2021 13:24

New EEG evaluations show how attentional focusing works after interruptions in working memory

Anne Rommel Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Leibniz-Institut für Arbeitsforschung an der TU Dortmund

    Interruptions at work often lead to a deterioration in performance in the original task. This performance deficit usually manifests itself in a delay in resuming the actual task. With the help of EEG measurements, researchers at the Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors in Dortmund (IfADo) have now analysed working memory processes when switching between different tasks in more detail. They were able to show that interruptions lead to more errors, longer reaction times and more inaccurate working memory content.

    The deterioration due to interruption can be attributed to the fact that demanding interruptions in particular disrupt human attention control processes. This makes it more difficult to return to the main task after an interruption. This connection could be shown in the EEG by means of oscillatory effects in the theta and alpha frequency range, which speak for a deficit in the control of attentional processes after interruptions.

    Resumption of the main task takes time

    In the study, a working memory task was interrupted by either a demanding or a less demanding arithmetic task. The study participants made more errors on the main task during high-demand interruptions and took longer to refocus on it after the interruption. Since the interruption task had to be completed in a certain amount of time, the task was made even more difficult.

    The researchers also draw the conclusion from the EEG data and the deterioration in performance after a demanding interruption that the subjects already had to redirect their attention back to the main task while working on the interruption. It can therefore be deduced from the results that sufficient time should be available for processing an interruption task in order to facilitate the return to the main task.


    Contact for scientific information:

    Dr. Bianca Zickerick
    Research Associate Ergonomics
    Phone: +49 231 1084-264
    Email: zickerick@ifado.de
    Marlene Rösner
    Research Associate Ergonomics
    Phone: +49 231 1084-325
    Email: roesner@ifado.de


    Original publication:

    Zickerick, B., Rösner, M., Sabo, M., & Schneider, D. (2021). How to refocus attention on working memory representations following interruptions – Evidence from frontal theta and posterior alpha oscillations. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15506


    Images

    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists
    Biology, Medicine, Psychology, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Research results
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).