idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft
Findings of University of Tübingen researchers challenge long-held assumptions about the stone tool origins of human culture
Archaeologically excavated stone tools – some as much as 2.6 million years old – have been hailed as evidence for an early cultural heritage in human evolution. But are these tools proof that our an-cestors were already becoming human, both mentally and culturally? Dr. Claudio Tennie und William Snyder from the Department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology at the University of Tü-bingen (Germany) have tested this traditional interpretation in a study funded by the European Re-search Council. They draw a different conclusion: as shown by an experimental study, the earliest techniques for making stone tools can be spontaneously reinvented even without cultural transmis-sion. They therefore are not evidence for the beginning of human culture, which possibly may have started much later, the researchers judge. The study was published in Science Advances.
Tools made from scratch
The authors asked 28 study participants (local adults, who did not study archaeology) to open a box containing monetary rewards. Participants were free to use provided raw materials – a painted glass hemisphere, a medium sized river pebble and a large granite block – in whatever manner they deemed suitable to break a rope that kept the box shut.
They were not given any information, let alone demonstrations and 25 participants proved – via post-test questionnaires – to have been naïve at start of test with regard to production techniques of early stone tools. Despite their naivety, the majority innovated at least one of these techniques and pro-ceeded to make and use the resulting tools to cut the rope locking the puzzle box. The authors found that every single production technique of early stone tools was thus re-innovated on the spot – from scratch – across the naïve participants.
“These data contradict earlier claims that learning how to make any stone tools must be inherently difficult and that it therefore is impossible to do in the absence of models to copy”, says Claudio Ten-nie. “If the earliest stone tools in the human record really had been the first cases of human culture, then they should resist spontaneous innovation – they should not come about anew ‘from scratch’, in the absence of cultural transmission.”
“When we asked other researchers about it before revealing our results, most did not predict this outcome. They strongly believed that all stone tool making requires copying. But it does not,” says Tennie.
“That stone tools existed 2,6 million years ago is no longer reliable ‘smoking gun’ evidence that our ancestors in the earliest Stone Age had culture like our own” Snyder summaries. “We must now look at much later time periods for the origin of modern human culture.”
High-res Images: https://www.pressefotos.uni-tuebingen.de/20220706%20Fotos%20Steinwerkzeuge.zip
Please note the credits
Dr. Claudio Tennie (study lead)
University of Tübingen
Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology
Phone +49 7071 29-72196
claudio.tennie@uni-tuebingen.de (Requests, incl. for telephone interviews, will be answered prompt-ly)
William D. Snyder
wdspaleo@gmail.com
William D. Snyder, Jonathan S. Reeves & Claudio Tennie: Early knapping techniques do not necessitate cultural transmission. Science Advances, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo2894
One participant of the study - who was naive to stone tools as well as any of their production techn ...
Illustrations and Video Stills: William D. Snyder (from Snyder et al. 2022)
2.6 million years old (A) and 1.7 million years old stone tools and an example of a result of the cu ...
Illustrations: William D. Snyder
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists
History / archaeology
transregional, national
Research results
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).
