idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Grafik: idw-Logo

idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft

Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
01/17/2024 12:18

Economy vs. science: ROARA analyses conflicts in research evaluation

Dr. Doreen Siegfried Marketing und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft

    In January 2024, the ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, together with an international research team, will launch the project "Impact of Open Access on Research Assessment" - called ROARA. The ROARA project analyses conflicts between economic and scientific interests and their impact on research evaluation. Prof Dr Isabella Peters from the ZBW is leading the project, which is being funded by the Volkswagen Foundation for four years.

    Publications play a central role in science. Researchers use them to disseminate their scientific findings. However, publications also determine careers, as they are used to evaluate researchers. Articles in renowned scientific journals help scientists to apply for a professorship or apply for funding, for example.

    When journals were still printed, publishing houses were financed by subscriptions to academic libraries. Since journals have been distributed online as part of digitisation, the open access movement has been campaigning for the removal of payment barriers in order to make academic publications freely accessible.

    Many scientific institutions support this and research funders are increasingly demanding that the results of funded projects are freely accessible via Open Access. Academic publishers are responding to this by adapting their business models. Instead of charging for reading, many are now asking authors to pay for publishing. These publications can reach several thousand euros per article.

    The ROARA - Repercussions of Open Access on Research Assessment project is now analysing where economic and scientific interests collide. This can be the case, for example, when publishers publish more in order to increase income, but do without sufficient quality control. These collisions and their effects on the evaluation of research are to be comprehensively analysed in this project. The results of the project will be of great importance for stakeholders in the fields of science policy, scientific communication and research evaluation.

    The interdisciplinary project is headed by Prof. Dr Isabella Peters from the ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics and is funded by the Volkswagen Foundation for four years. The team from Bielefeld University, led by Dr Niels Taubert (Bibliometrics Working Group and Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Science), and the team from Ottawa University (Canada), led by Prof. Dr Stefanie Haustein, Professor at the School of Information Studies and Co-Director of the ScholCommLab, bring extensive experience in mixed-methods research in the field of scholarly communication and bibliometrics. The ROARA team combines disciplinary perspectives from the fields of bibliometrics, library and information science, web science, economics and sociology of science.


    Contact for scientific information:

    Prof. Dr. Isabella Peters
    https://www.zbw.eu/en/about-us/staff-profiles/profile-professor-isabella-peters


    More information:

    https://www.zbw.eu/en/research/web-science/translate-to-englisch-roara


    Images

    Research project led by the ZBW sheds light on the collision of interests in the science system
    Research project led by the ZBW sheds light on the collision of interests in the science system
    Timo Wilke
    ZBW


    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists, Scientists and scholars
    Economics / business administration, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Research projects, Science policy
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).