idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Grafik: idw-Logo

idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft

Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
11/14/2024 11:30

In Search of the Mechanisms of Voice Preferences

Sara Bertsche Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Max-Planck-Institut für empirische Ästhetik

    It’s not what you say, but how you say it, right? The way people talk determines, among other things, whether we listen to what the other person has to say and, for example, whether we like them. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (MPIEA) in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, wondered whether people agree more with each other depending on the type of vocalization. Their study revealed a surprising finding: Preferences for singing and speaking voices are highly individual. The results have recently been published in the journal “Royal Society Open Science.”

    To find out what aesthetic effect different vocalizations have on their recipients, the research team first created a set of audio recordings with short melody excerpts performed by 22 professional singers in three different singing styles: lullaby, pop, and operatic singing. They also spoke the same words in two different variations: one as if they were addressing an adult and the other as if they were addressing a baby.

    A total of 62 participants came to the Institute and listened to the recordings. They were asked to rate how much they liked each recording. The researchers were interested in not only individual preferences, but also in whether there would be higher consensus on some vocalization styles than others. The researchers expected, for example, that lullabies, which are generally perceived as more natural or universal, would lead to higher consensus (or shared taste) than operatic singing, which is a more artificial type of singing.

    “As expected, there was higher shared taste (or agreement) for lullabies than for pop songs, but surprisingly, there was an equivalent amount of shared taste for lullabies and for operatic singing. We also suspected that there would be an equal amount of agreement for both types of speech, but found that there was a greater consensus for speech aimed at children than for speech aimed at adults—probably because many found the vocalization aimed at children annoying,” reports first author Camila Bruder from the MPIEA.

    Are Some Voices Fundamentally More Likeable?

    The researchers also tested whether some singers were consistently preferred across all styles of singing. They compared the ranking of singers across all singing styles and found that it varied depending on the style, leading the team to conclude that some voices were better received in certain styles than others.

    The study showed that preferences for different types of vocalizations are highly individual. However, for a detailed understanding of the underlying mechanisms, further research with a broad approach is needed. Among others, the expertise of a study participant in the evaluation of voices—e.g., a person with specific knowledge of opera singing—is of interest to the researchers. Equally promising is a study with a wider range of vocalizations, such as rap or poetry.

    “Future research should aim to further characterize voice preferences in an integrative way–measured in different geographical, linguistic and cultural contexts,” concludes Camila Bruder.


    Contact for scientific information:

    Camila Bruder


    Original publication:

    Bruder, C., Frieler, K., & Larrouy-Maestri, P. (2024). Valuation of Singing and Speaking Voices Is Highly Idiosyncratic. Royal Society Open Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241623


    Images

    A lullaby, a pop song, an opera performance and two speaking styles: study participants had to rate different vocalizations.
    A lullaby, a pop song, an opera performance and two speaking styles: study participants had to rate ...
    Lorna Bittner
    MPI für empirische Ästhetik / L. Bittner


    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists, Scientists and scholars
    Cultural sciences, Language / literature, Music / theatre, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Research results, Scientific Publications
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).