idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft
How strongly does our metabolism influence thinking? This question has been examined by Dr. Philipp Haueis, a philosopher of science at Bielefeld University, in a recent publication in the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Together with his co-author David J. Colaço, PhD, from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Haueis explores how the brain’s metabolism shapes our cognitive abilities, processes such as memory, perception, and attention.
“We wanted to find out what happens when you take the brain’s energy demands seriously,” says Haueis. “The brain is not an abstract computer but an organ that needs energy and has limits. These limits influence how we think, remember, and make decisions.”
The human brain accounts for only about two percent of body mass but consumes around 20 percent of the body’s energy. Despite this high consumption, it operates far more efficiently than modern computers. Yet many scientific models designed to explain perception, memory, or attention hardly take these energetic constraints into account. This is precisely where the study comes in.
Metabolism as a key to realistic models of thought
The researchers show that metabolism—the chemical processes that supply and consume energy in the body—plays two central roles in the study of thinking. First, it can help determine whether existing cognitive models (theoretical descriptions of mental processes) are biologically plausible at all. Any model that requires more energy than the brain can provide is unrealistic. Second, knowledge about metabolism can be used to develop new models. These models may offer new insights into previously overlooked relationships between brain structure and information processing, for example, how neural networks use energy to learn efficiently.
A call for interdisciplinary thinking
The publication is the first to systematically summarize how metabolic insights can be used for modeling mental processes and why this is philosophically necessary. Through the journal’s “Open Peer Commentary” format, in which researchers from various disciplines publicly comment on the work, a broad debate is expected to emerge.
This debate reaches far beyond specialist communities. The study has far-reaching implications for understanding mental effort, for theories of computation in the brain, and for questions about how artificial intelligence compares to biological intelligence.
“If we understand that thinking costs energy, we also better understand why attention is limited and why machine learning—unconstrained by biology—follows different paths,” says Haueis. Thus, the study not only contributes to basic research but also provides impulses for societal discussions about AI, energy efficiency, and the nature of intelligence itself.
The study was conducted within the Institute for Studies of Science (ISoS) at Bielefeld University, which received the status of a central academic unit in May 2025. ISoS brings together interdisciplinary research on science, medicine, and technology and examines how scientific practices are embedded in societal contexts.
Dr. Philipp Haueis, Bielefeld University
Abteilung Philosophie
Telefon +49 521 106-4585
E-Mail: philipp.haueis@uni-bielefeld.de
Originalpublication (Preprint): Philipp Haueis und David J. Colaço, PhD: Metabolic considerations for cognitive modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25103956 Published on 18.11.2025.
https://www.uni-bielefeld.de/zwe/isos/ The Institute for Studies of Science (ISoS)
https://aktuell.uni-bielefeld.de/2025/11/24/thinking-takes-energy/?lang=en Text on Website of Bielefeld University
Dr Philipp Haueis is a philosopher of science at the Faculty of History, Philosophy and Theology at ...
Source: Vreni Jäckle
Copyright: Vreni Jäckle
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars, Students, all interested persons
Chemistry, Cultural sciences, Information technology, Philosophy / ethics, Social studies
transregional, national
Research results, Transfer of Science or Research
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).
