idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft
Global efforts to combat climate change in the last two decades have contributed to considerably cutting carbon emissions, according to a new study on climate policies conducted primarily by scientists from Germany and the United Kingdom, among them experts from Heidelberg University. It shows that states with larger and stricter policy portfolios are cutting their emissions most effectively.
Press Release
Heidelberg, 24 February 2026
Ambitious Climate Policy Ensures Reduction of CO2 Emissions
Study with Heidelberg participation: states with larger and stricter climate policy portfolios are cutting their emissions most effectively
Global efforts to combat climate change in the last two decades have contributed to considerably cutting carbon emissions, according to a new study conducted primarily by scientists from Germany and the United Kingdom. The participating researchers investigated which climate policies were particularly effective. Reduced emissions have generally been the result of ambitious, i.e., larger and stricter climate policy portfolios. In addition, countries targeting the largest sources of emissions were particularly successful, according to the experts from Heidelberg University, who played a major role in the study.
The research findings are based on a statistical analysis of a comprehensive data set on climate policies implemented between 2000 and 2022 in the 43 largest economies worldwide, which are responsible for well over three-quarters of emissions worldwide. This analysis was accompanied by case studies for Brazil, China, Estonia, Indonesia, Israel, Mexico, the UK and the United States, mostly conducted at Heidelberg University’s Institute of Political Science. The calculations made by the international team of scientists show the tangible impact of global efforts to fight climate change. They indicate that existing climate policies saved three billion tons of CO2 in 2022 alone. That roughly corresponds, the researchers say, to the annual emissions of the whole of the European Union.
For the study, the team at Heidelberg University, headed by political scientist Prof. Dr Jale Tosun, examined which specific policy instruments – that is, economic, regulatory or voluntary instruments – were used in individual states. “Here we followed up the question of whether broad-brush or, rather, specialized approaches were more successful in cutting emissions,” explains Dr Simon Bulian, an academic staff member in Prof. Tosun’s team. The results show that states focusing on an economic approach – for example, Estonia – or a regulatory approach – for example, Israel – were able to cut their emissions more effectively than states without such specializations. In addition, a key factor was targeting the leading sources of carbon emissions, in most cases energy generation and transport.
Independently of the focus adopted in terms of climate policy, economic instruments proved especially effective for cutting emissions, including, for example, a carbon tax or subsidizing renewable energies, Dr Bulian explains. According to the scientist, the study also points to a positive influence of international cooperation. Climate action tools were more effective in countries that – as a consequence of international climate conferences – had written long-term climate goals into law and hence pursued a stricter climate policy. Likewise, involvement in international organizations such as the International Energy Agency or the Clean Energy Ministerial has led to greater effectiveness of climate policy.
“Countries’ climate policy portfolios are growing – and they work, in spite of increasing political debates about whether they are necessary and efficient. Nevertheless, the emissions are still far too high to stop climate change or at least slow it down,” Prof. Tosun emphasizes. “The challenge for the future will be to implement policy instruments in an even more targeted and stringent way than has happened to date.” Participating in the study were scientists from Cardiff University, the University of Oxford, the University of East Anglia and the London School of Economics and Political Science, Heidelberg University and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria. The studies were largely funded by the European Union, the UK Economic and Social Research Council, and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan. The research findings were published in “Nature Communications”.
Caption:
The illustration shows the number of climate policies adopted by the 43 largest economies in the world (OECD countries and BRICS states) and changes in CO2 emission intensity, which reflects CO2 emissions relative to a country’s economic output (CO2/gross domestic product). The blue line demonstrates that the number of policies has increased significantly over time. At the same time, CO2 emission intensity (red line) has fallen. On average, the states emitted significantly less CO2 relative to their economic output in 2022 than in 2000. Illustration: Simon Bulian (Heidelberg University)
Contact:
Heidelberg University
Communications and Marketing
Press Office, phone +49 6221 54-2311
presse@rektorat.uni-heidelberg.de
Heidelberg University
Institute of Political Science
Prof. Dr Jale Tosun
Phone +49 6221 54-3726
jale.tosun@ipw.uni-heidelberg.de
Dr Simon Bulian
Phone +49 6221 54-2898
simon.bulian@ipw.uni-heidelberg.de
T. Arvanitopoulos, S. Bulian, C. Wilson, A.J. Jordan, J. Tosun, and N. Vasilakos: Climate policy portfolios that accelerate emission reductions. Nature Communications (23 January 2026), doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-68577-z
https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/politikwissenschaften/institut_en.html – Institute of Political Science
https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/politikwissenschaften/personal/tosun/person/index_... – Jale Tosun
https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/politikwissenschaften/personal/tosun/mitarbeiter/s... – Simon Bulian
The illustration shows the number of climate policies adopted by the 43 largest economies in the wor ...
Copyright: Illustration: Simon Bulian (Heidelberg University)
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists
Environment / ecology, Politics
transregional, national
Research results
English

You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).