idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft
From August 2026, an EU-wide AI regulation will come into force requiring the labelling of AI-generated content. However, a research team from the University of Bayreuth and Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, has found that users of AI systems can no longer reliably recall after just one week whether content was generated by AI or not. The researchers presented their findings at the CHI conference, the most important and largest international conference in the field of Human–Computer Interaction.
---
Why it matters
Interactive and generative AI systems are increasingly used in creative work, such as brainstorming ideas or drafting texts. If AI use is to be disclosed at a later stage—as required by the EU regulation from August 2026 for content created for commercial purposes—an accurate memory of how the content was produced is essential. The findings of the Bayreuth study have implications for how individuals use AI and for the design of AI systems and requirements for AI labelling.
---
Whether summaries, social media captions, infographics, image editing, slogans, or prompts for reflection—the digital world is now filled with AI. To prevent deception and to ensure transparency about the origin of content, a labelling obligation for content intended for the public will apply from this summer.
“However, after just one week, significant false memories already occur regarding which ideas and texts were generated by AI and which were created by oneself,” says Tim Zindulka, doctoral researcher at the University of Bayreuth’s Mobile Intelligent User Interfaces research group and leading author of the study.
A total of 184 study participants developed texts either with or without the assistance of AI. After one week, they were asked about how the ideas and the final texts had been produced.
“Workflows in which human and artificial intelligence were combined were particularly prone to errors—that is, when the idea came from AI but the formulation was done by the human, and vice versa,” explains Professor Dr. Daniel Buschek, Chair of Mobile Intelligent User Interfaces at the University of Bayreuth. After seven days, the probability of correctly recalling the attribute “AI-generated” falls to 37.7% when an AI-generated idea is formulated by a human. Conversely, there is a 64% chance of correctly identifying one’s own idea after a week if the final wording was produced by AI.
“Our study shows that retrospective questioning about how content was created does not lead to realistic results. As individuals using AI, people may come to adopt AI-generated ideas as their own, or conversely underestimate their own capabilities because they mistakenly recall a self-generated idea as AI-generated,” says Zindulka. He adds: “These findings should also be considered in the design of AI systems and in guidelines for AI labelling. For example, in a university context, it is unrealistic to expect students to retrospectively disclose details of AI use in coursework based on memory alone. Instead, it is more effective to document the process of content creation from the outset.”
The study was conducted in collaboration with Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland, and funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG; project number 525037874).
Prof. Dr. Daniel Buschek
Mobile Intelligent User Interfaces
University of Bayreuth
Phone: +49 (0)921 / 55-7775
E-mail: daniel.buschek@uni-bayreuth.de
The AI Memory Gap: Users Misremember What They Created With AI or Without. Tim Zindulka et al. CHI ’26 Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2026)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791494
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars, Students, all interested persons
Information technology
transregional, national
Research projects, Scientific Publications
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).
