idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
04/25/2024 13:54

New Meta-Analysis Shows That Having a Dialect or Accent May Disadvantage Applicants in Recruitment Processes

Dr. Japhet Johnstone Stabsstelle Kommunikation und Marketing
Freie Universität Berlin

    Researchers recommend the use of structured interviews to reduce potential biases

    People who speak a regional dialect or who have an accent may be at a disadvantage in personnel selection processes. This is the result of a new meta-analysis carried out by researchers at Freie Universität Berlin, the Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, and Ulm University. The team of researchers discovered that applicants who spoke nonstandard language (e.g., ethnic and migration-based language varieties or regional dialects) were perceived as less competent in job interviews and were thus less likely to receive a job offer. The study, titled “Do Ethnic, Migration-Based, and Regional Language Varieties Put Applicants at a Disadvantage? A Meta-analysis of Biases in Personnel Selection” was published in the prestigious scientific journal Applied Psychology and is available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12528.

    The researchers analyzed data from 3,615 participants across twenty-two individual studies, meaning that their results represent a comprehensive view of current international research on this subject. All primary studies used for the meta-analysis were based on either Standard US/British English or German as the standard language. The study compared how job interviews of applicants who spoke standard language with those who spoke nonstandard language were perceived and evaluated, even when the candidates’ replies to questions were identical in terms of content.
    Results of the Study

    The team of researchers, led by Niklas Schulte from Freie Universität Berlin (Division for Psychological Assessment, Differential and Personality Psychology), made two key findings:

    Applicants who speak nonstandard language are considered less competent than standard language-speaking applicants with the same qualifications. Their perceived “hirability” was also rated lower than otherwise identical standard language-speaking candidates.
    Furthermore, there was no evidence that professional human resources managers were less likely to be influenced by these biases in their hiring decisions than nonprofessionals. Similarly, the disadvantages experienced by nonstandard language speakers were not reduced when the interviews were conducted by other nonstandard language speakers.

    Recommendations

    Based on the results of their meta-analysis, researchers Niklas Schulte (Freie Universität Berlin), Johannes M. Basch (the Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences), Hannah-Sophie Hay (Ulm University), and Klaus Melchers (Ulm University), recommend using structured interviews with predefined questions that focus on the job itself. “Evaluations should be made with regard to the candidate’s qualifications and suitability for the position – as demonstrated by the content of their answers, not their accent or the language they use. This could help us to reduce the negative effects of bias or misplaced judgments and ensure a fairer selection process,” says Schulte.


    Contact for scientific information:

    Dr. Niklas Schulte, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Email: n.schulte@fu-berlin.de.


    Original publication:

    Schulte, N., Basch, J. M., Hay, H.-S., and Melchers, K. G. "Do Ethnic, Migration-Based, and Regional Language Varieties Put Applicants at a Disadvantage? A Meta-analysis of Biases in Personnel Selection." Applied Psychology (2024): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12528. Print version available soon.


    Images

    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists, Scientists and scholars
    Psychology
    transregional, national
    Research results
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).