Liberal societies are under pressure worldwide: internally eroded by right-wing populist electoral victories and growing economic inequality, externally challenged by the power play of autocratic governments. The survey “Public Attitudes towards the Liberal Script” (PALS), conducted in thirty countries with over 60,000 participants, provides a crucial basis for future research. The resulting dataset offers insights into attitudes toward liberal principles and institutions and is now available to the public.
The global comparative public opinion survey “Public Attitudes towards the Liberal Script” (PALS), conducted by the “Comparative Survey” research group of SCRIPTS between December 2021 and February 2023, examines how people view the core values, principles, and institutions of the liberal script. The survey investigated the attitudes of more than 60,000 people in thirty countries regarding key liberal components such as self-determination, market economy, and rule of law.
“PALS aims to enable a better understanding of what people think about the liberal societal model from a global perspective in order to look for crucial patterns regarding differences between countries as well as social groups,” says Dr. Heiko Giebler, head of the “Comparative Survey” research group. The datasets and documentation from the first and second waves of the survey are now freely accessible for non-commercial use and individual analyses via Refubium, Freie Universität Berlin’s institutional repository.
Initial Findings
According to the PALS team, the results of the survey are already looking promising. In order to produce an initial analysis, the research team developed an index measuring respondents’ support for core pillars of the liberal script. While a higher socio-economic development level correlates with stronger approval, traditionally liberal countries such as France, the United Kingdom, and the United States rank more in the middle. Authoritarian values and a feeling of social marginalization lead to a rejection of the liberal script in all countries.
In a question where respondents were asked to select topics that they considered a major threat to their respective country and its population, issues like gender inequality and immigration were chosen significantly less frequently than economic inequality or hunger and poverty on a global scale. This suggests that the prevalence of the former topics in media coverage does not necessarily reflect the actual concerns of the population.
Ongoing Studies
Karoline Estermann, a doctoral candidate at the Berlin Graduate School for Global and Transregional Studies (BGTS), has already used the PALS data to typologize patterns of liberal attitudes. Her study is guided by two questions: Are democracy and its principles such as self-determination, equality, rule of law, and progress perceived as desirable on a global scale? And what freedoms do people grant their fellow human beings? She considers the preliminary results surprising: “While I expected global political crises to indicate more illiberal attitudes and polarization, the mood reflects moderate differences of opinion alongside widespread support for democratic core principles.”
Lukas Antoine and Rasmus Ollroge, doctoral candidates and members of the “Comparative Survey” research group, have also been able to utilize the PALS study for their own research. For his investigation into the acceptance of state surveillance measures, which heavily relies on PALS data, Antoine has particularly appreciated “the global range of PALS, which includes countries from the Global South, covering more than just ‘the usual suspects.’” Ollroge, who is using the data for his dissertation on the winners and losers of globalization, highlights the high sample quality and methodological transparency, describing the open-source project as “groundbreaking for future research.”
“Contestations of the Liberal Script” (SCRIPTS) is a multidisciplinary Cluster of Excellence that has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) since 2019. It examines why the liberal model, despite its political, economic, and social achievements, has fallen into crisis and what consequences this has for the global challenges of our time.
Maria Silva de Almeida, Science Communication and Public Relations Officer, Cluster of Excellence “Contestations of the Liberal Script (SCRIPTS),” Freie Universität Berlin, Tel.: +49 (0)30 838 58896, Email: public-relations@scripts-berlin.eu
Dr Heiko Giebler is the head of the SCRIPTS “Comparative Survey” research group and the Cluster’s Data Methodology Center (DMC), Email: h.giebler@fu-berlin.de
Lukas Antoine is a research associate at SCRIPTS focusing on privacy and surveillance, Email: lukas.antoine@fu-berlin.de
Rasmus Ollroge is a research associate at SCRIPTS working on communitarianism, cultural capital, lifestyles, and political sociology, Email: r.ollroge@fu-berlin.de
Karoline Estermann is a research associate at SCRIPTS focusing on political sociology, legal sociology, and norms and belief system, Email: karoline.estermann@fu-berlin.de
https://www.scripts-berlin.eu/, SCRIPTS Cluster of Excellence website
https://www.scripts-berlin.eu/research/pals/index.html, PALS website
https://www.scripts-berlin.eu/research/pals/data-and-documentation/index.html, PALS Datasets and Documentation
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/41546, PALS Dataset – Wave 1
https://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41374, PALS Dataset – Wave 2
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars
Cultural sciences, Economics / business administration, History / archaeology, Politics, Social studies
transregional, national
Research projects, Research results
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).