idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Axelrod's 1980 tournament highlighted the dominance of "Tit for Tat" and introduced principles like "be nice" and "avoid envy."
A recent study with 195 strategies shows that diversity and context play a much larger role than previously thought.
Key traits of successful strategies include adaptability, cleverness, and moderate competitiveness.
An international research team from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Cardiff University, and Google has reexamined Axelrod's groundbreaking work. By simulating over 195 strategies in thousands of tournaments, the study revealed that success in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma depends heavily on adaptation to diverse environments. Strategies that excelled in Axelrod’s controlled scenarios often failed when faced with a wider variety of opponents. Winning strategies are not only nice and reciprocal but also clever, slightly envious, and adaptable to the surrounding conditions.
The Prisoner’s Dilemma, a classic game in game theory, presents players with the choice to cooperate or defect. Mutual cooperation results in moderate rewards for both players, while unilateral defection yields a high reward for the defector and a significant loss for the cooperator. If both players defect, they receive less than they would through mutual cooperation. This tension between individual and collective benefit has made the game a model for decision-making in economics, politics, and biology.
In 1980, Robert Axelrod organized one of the most influential Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma tournaments. He invited scientists worldwide to submit strategies in computer code. The winning strategy, "Tit for Tat," followed four key principles: avoid envy, be nice, reciprocate, and keep it simple. While these principles explained the success of "Tit for Tat" in Axelrod’s tournament, the study had notable limitations. Only 14 strategies were tested, and preliminary results were shared with participants, potentially influencing submissions. Moreover, the controlled nature of the tournaments, with limited variety and rigid rules, did not reflect the complexity of real-world scenarios.
The recent study tested 195 strategies from published works in thousands of tournaments under diverse conditions. The results showed that strategies considered dominant in controlled environments often struggled against more varied opponents. Instead of identifying a single winning strategy, the team uncovered shared traits of successful approaches: They are slightly envious, smart, reciprocal, adaptable, and willing to align cooperation levels with their environment.
The analyses relied on "Axelrod-Python," an open-source tool that catalogs strategies and facilitates large-scale simulations. This tool promotes open science, enabling researchers worldwide to explore game theory in more realistic scenarios. The study underscores the need to revisit Axelrod's principles to better account for the dynamics of more complex environments.
Dr. Nikoleta E. Glynatsi
Postdoctoral researcher
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
Glynatsi NE, Knight V, Harper M (2024)
Properties of winning Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma strategies
PLOS Computational Biology
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012644
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars
Biology, Mathematics
transregional, national
Research results, Transfer of Science or Research
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).
