idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instanz:
Teilen: 
07.01.2025 10:35

Properties of Winning Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Strategies

Michael Hesse Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionsbiologie

    Axelrod's 1980 tournament highlighted the dominance of "Tit for Tat" and introduced principles like "be nice" and "avoid envy."

    A recent study with 195 strategies shows that diversity and context play a much larger role than previously thought.

    Key traits of successful strategies include adaptability, cleverness, and moderate competitiveness.

    An international research team from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Cardiff University, and Google has reexamined Axelrod's groundbreaking work. By simulating over 195 strategies in thousands of tournaments, the study revealed that success in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma depends heavily on adaptation to diverse environments. Strategies that excelled in Axelrod’s controlled scenarios often failed when faced with a wider variety of opponents. Winning strategies are not only nice and reciprocal but also clever, slightly envious, and adaptable to the surrounding conditions.

    The Prisoner’s Dilemma, a classic game in game theory, presents players with the choice to cooperate or defect. Mutual cooperation results in moderate rewards for both players, while unilateral defection yields a high reward for the defector and a significant loss for the cooperator. If both players defect, they receive less than they would through mutual cooperation. This tension between individual and collective benefit has made the game a model for decision-making in economics, politics, and biology.

    In 1980, Robert Axelrod organized one of the most influential Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma tournaments. He invited scientists worldwide to submit strategies in computer code. The winning strategy, "Tit for Tat," followed four key principles: avoid envy, be nice, reciprocate, and keep it simple. While these principles explained the success of "Tit for Tat" in Axelrod’s tournament, the study had notable limitations. Only 14 strategies were tested, and preliminary results were shared with participants, potentially influencing submissions. Moreover, the controlled nature of the tournaments, with limited variety and rigid rules, did not reflect the complexity of real-world scenarios.

    The recent study tested 195 strategies from published works in thousands of tournaments under diverse conditions. The results showed that strategies considered dominant in controlled environments often struggled against more varied opponents. Instead of identifying a single winning strategy, the team uncovered shared traits of successful approaches: They are slightly envious, smart, reciprocal, adaptable, and willing to align cooperation levels with their environment.

    The analyses relied on "Axelrod-Python," an open-source tool that catalogs strategies and facilitates large-scale simulations. This tool promotes open science, enabling researchers worldwide to explore game theory in more realistic scenarios. The study underscores the need to revisit Axelrod's principles to better account for the dynamics of more complex environments.


    Wissenschaftliche Ansprechpartner:

    Dr. Nikoleta E. Glynatsi
    Postdoctoral researcher
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology


    Originalpublikation:

    Glynatsi NE, Knight V, Harper M (2024)
    Properties of winning Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma strategies
    PLOS Computational Biology
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012644


    Bilder

    Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
    Journalisten, Wissenschaftler
    Biologie, Mathematik
    überregional
    Forschungs- / Wissenstransfer, Forschungsergebnisse
    Englisch


     

    Hilfe

    Die Suche / Erweiterte Suche im idw-Archiv
    Verknüpfungen

    Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.

    Klammern

    Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).

    Wortgruppen

    Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.

    Auswahlkriterien

    Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).

    Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).