idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
International consortium of researchers coordinated by Mainz University presents analysis results in an open access volume of articles
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in many countries worldwide to provide public social services, assisting in entitlement decisions to state-paid pensions and unemployment benefits, assessments of asylum applications, and assignments of places at kindergartens. AI technology is intended to help apply fairness criteria in the allocation of this kind of support to individuals and to assess potential beneficiaries accordingly. However, fairness criteria vary from country to country. In India, for example, the caste system influences the distribution of social benefits. In China, access to social services is determined by a "good citizenship" score. But the concepts of fairness in terms of access to limited public resources also vary within Europe. These are major findings from the participative research undertaken by members of the AI FORA – Artificial Intelligence for Assessment project, which were published recently in an online open access volume. The project, coordinated by Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU), ran for three and half years. Other participants included the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Kaiserslautern, the University of Augsburg, and the University of Surrey in the UK. The Volkswagen Foundation provided about EUR 1.5 million to finance the project, which was completed in December 2024.
Comparison of AI-based social assessment in nine countries across four continents
The open access volume, extending to some 300 pages, compares the status quo and the desired scenarios of AI-supported social evaluations in nine countries across four continents: Germany, Spain, Estonia, Ukraine, the USA, Nigeria, Iran, India, and China. "The case studies make apparent the extent to which criteria for being granted state services are determined by culture- and context-related factors. Even within societies, there are very different perspectives that are subject to constant reconsideration and negotiation. This must be reflected in the production of AI technology. Therefore, it is not sufficient to develop a single, standardized AI system for social assessment in public service provision and deploy it worldwide. We need flexible, dynamic, and adaptive systems. Their development requires the participation of all social stakeholders, including vulnerable groups, to design participatory, context-sensitive, and fair AI," emphasized Professor Petra Ahrweiler of JGU's Institute of Sociology, who coordinated the Al FORA project. The AI FORA researchers are currently preparing another publication in which they will outline the policy-relevant modeling and simulation results of the project. They aim to demonstrate how artificial intelligence can be improved to address fairness and discrimination issues in the allocation of public social services.
Related links:
• https://www.ai-fora.de/ – Artificial Intelligence for Assessment (AI FORA)
Read more:
• https://press.uni-mainz.de/can-ai-technologies-help-create-social-justice/ – press release "Can AI technologies help create social justice?" (29 July 2024)
Professor Dr. Petra Ahrweiler
Sociology of Technology and Innovation, Social Simulation
Institute of Sociology
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
55099 Mainz
phone: +49 6131 39-29132
e-mail: petra.ahrweiler@uni-mainz.de
https://technologyandinnovation.sociology.uni-mainz.de/team/prof-dr-petra-ahrwei...
P. Ahrweiler (ed.), Participatory Artificial Intelligence in Public Social Services. From Bias to Fairness in Assessing Beneficiaries, Springer Cham, 3 March 2025,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-71678-2
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-71678-2
Criteria of this press release:
Business and commerce, Journalists, all interested persons
Cultural sciences, Economics / business administration, Information technology, Politics, Social studies
transregional, national
Research results, Scientific Publications
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).
