The interplay of different ideas shapes how students learn and understand specific concepts in biology. A new study has investigated how a scientific understanding of evolution can be promoted / publication in ‘Science Education’
A new study conducted by the Institute for Biology Education has concluded that the way in which supporting knowledge of key evolutionary findings is taught in biology lessons influences the entire network of knowledge that students acquire. The study suggests that students who learn about ‘threshold concepts’ such as randomness and probability in relation to evolution in a biological context develop a more concentrated, interconnected, and better-structured understanding of biology. The results of the study “Threshold Concepts and Concept Networks in Evolution Education: An Experimental Intervention Study” have been published in the scientific journal Science Education.
In the study, Professor Dr Jörg Großschedl and Dr Helena Aptyka from the University of Cologne and Dr Daniela Fiedler from the University of Copenhagen analysed the interplay of different ideas that 10th-grade students have formed in biology lessons on the subject of evolution – their concept network. The different types of concepts that comprise the concept network include key concepts, misconceptions, and threshold concepts. Concepts are ideas or mental models about evolutionary biological phenomena that students develop during the learning process. They can be scientifically correct or incorrect.
Key concepts are scientifically based, central ideas that are essential for a correct understanding of evolution. They include, for example, the concepts of variation, inheritance, and individual fitness, which form the basis for explaining evolutionary change.
Conversely, misconceptions are usually cognitively deeply rooted, technically inaccurate or naive ideas that are often based on everyday experiences or simplified explanations. In connection with the theory of evolution, they can be seen, for instance, in teleological thinking (“animals develop characteristics because they need them”) or in goal-oriented interpretations. Such concepts contradict scientific explanations and hinder a deeper understanding of key concepts. Threshold concepts, in contrast, are challenging and abstract concepts that enable a cognitive breakthrough and can permanently alter students’ perceptions. They are seen as ‘portals’ to deeper understanding and necessitate the rethinking of misconceptions. In the theory of evolution, randomness and probability are among the threshold concepts relationed to natural selection.
“Analysing concepts as networks opens up innovative educational perspectives for teaching in the natural sciences by showing how students structure concepts and connect them with each other. Addressing threshold concepts in biology lessons can significantly increase the complexity and coherence of concept networks,” says Professor Dr Jörg Großschedl from the Institute for Biology Education at the University of Cologne.
According to the authors, the study’s findings show that addressing threshold concepts can significantly increase the complexity and coherence of concept networks. “Students are generally able to combine a variety of concepts in a meaningful way, but they need focused educational support to do so. We hope that our findings will improve teaching in the natural sciences,” states Dr Helena Aptyka, academic counselor at the institute.
The team is currently planning an intervention study on the threshold concept of temporal scales, where the researchers will be investigating the extent to which teaching provided on short and long periods of time can promote the understanding of evolution – for example, with regard to micro- and macroevolution.
Dr Helena Aptyka
Institute for Biology Education, University of Cologne
+49 221 470 4945
h.aptyka@uni-koeln.de
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21977
Criteria of this press release:
Journalists, Scientists and scholars, Students, Teachers and pupils, all interested persons
Biology, Teaching / education
transregional, national
Research results, Scientific Publications
English
You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.
You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).
Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.
You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).
If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).