idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
12/18/2025 14:13

How people see animals: They think and feel – but not like us

Nina Vogt, Translation: Matthew Rockey Stabsstelle Universitätskommunikation / Medienredaktion
Universität Leipzig

    Do animals think and feel? How this question is answered has a direct bearing on how empathetically and considerately people treat animals. An international team led by researchers in Leipzig has now found that people from different cultural contexts are surprisingly consistent in their views: while many adults and children assume that animals are generally capable of thinking and feeling, they do not attribute human-like thoughts to them.

    Much of the existing psychological research on human perceptions of animals has focused on people from Western societies. For their large-scale study, the scientists from the “Children and Nature” research group at Leipzig University’s LeipzigLab and at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (MPI-EVA) adopted a cross-cultural approach, involving people of different ages from a wide range of social and socio-cultural contexts. For the study, they surveyed more than 1,000 children aged 4 to 17 and almost 200 adults from 33 communities in 15 countries, asking them to what extent they believed animals could feel and think.

    Belief in the uniqueness of human thinking

    The largely similar assessments came as a surprise to the researchers, explains Professor Katja Liebal of Leipzig University, who led the study together with first author Karri Neldner and Professor Daniel Haun of MPI-EVA. Most respondents were convinced that animals are generally capable of thoughts and feelings, but that their thinking fundamentally differs from human thinking. Views were less uniform when it came to whether animals can have human-like emotions.

    Even though the sample size is not sufficient to generalise the findings to all people, the researchers see the data as pointing to a fundamental human belief: what people primarily regard as separating them from other animals is thinking. Humans see themselves as mentally unique.

    Implications for how people treat animals

    “The belief in the uniqueness of human thinking emerges early in life and remains stable across the entire lifespan,” explains Neldner. This assessment has important implications for how other living beings are treated: “The mental capacities attributed to animals also determine their moral status. In this way, people can justify using animals for food, medicine or entertainment.”

    At the same time, animal species perceived as sentient or human-like receive disproportionately high levels of protection, donations and political support. “This is particularly problematic in the context of species extinction and biodiversity loss: insects, which are heavily affected by these developments, receive far less attention and interest than mammals, even though mammals make up only a fraction of overall biodiversity,” says Liebal.

    In addition, the researchers found that the children and adolescents surveyed in urban communities were more likely to attribute thoughts and feelings to animals than their peers in rural areas. Possible reasons include the fact that children in cities are more frequently exposed to human-like representations of animals, or that children in rural areas more often encounter animals that are dangerous, harmful or kept as livestock, which may foster emotional distance.

    The research team chose an unusual survey method for their study: unlike in many psychological studies, the interviews were not conducted by researchers, but by people from the respective cultural contexts and communities. These interviewers had previously been trained in interview techniques and evaluation. The interviews were subsequently translated, transcribed and analysed by the researchers using both qualitative and quantitative methods. “Even though the study process was far less controlled than it would have been if we had invited participants into a laboratory, we are convinced that the data obtained in this way are far more valuable, as they were generated within the respective cultural contexts,” says Liebal.



    Background

    From 2020 to 2023, the LeipzigLab research group “Children and Nature” investigated the attitudes of children and adolescents towards animals and the development of these attitudes in different socio-cultural contexts. The group comprised researchers from behavioural biology as well as developmental and cross-cultural psychology at Leipzig University and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, along with additional partners. The researchers involved are currently analysing the data and preparing further publications.


    Contact for scientific information:

    Professor Katja Liebal
    Leipzig University
    Tel.: 0341 97-36879
    katja.liebal@uni-leipzig.de

    Professor Daniel Haun
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
    haun@eva.mpg.de

    Karri Neldner
    University of Western Australia
    karri.neldner@uwa.edu.au


    Original publication:

    Original title of the publication in the Journal of Environmental Psychology:
    “Children and adults across 15 countries believe in human uniqueness of mind: a cross-cultural investigation of cross-species mind perception”, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102861 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425003445


    Images

    Among other things, the researchers surveyed more than 1,000 children on the extent to which they believed animals could feel and think.
    Among other things, the researchers surveyed more than 1,000 children on the extent to which they be ...

    Copyright: Colourbox


    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists, Scientists and scholars, all interested persons
    Biology, Philosophy / ethics, Psychology, Zoology / agricultural and forest sciences
    transregional, national
    Research results
    English


     

    Among other things, the researchers surveyed more than 1,000 children on the extent to which they believed animals could feel and think.


    For download

    x

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).