idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Grafik: idw-Logo

idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft

Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instance:
Share on: 
08/06/2025 16:13

Beyond Words: The Cognitive Force of Metaphor

Jana Gregor Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften (MPIMIS)

    A new study provides insights into the structural and cognitive dimensions of metaphors, revealing how they shape our thinking and language – far beyond their role as rhetorical devices. The article was recently published in PLOS Complex Systems.

    To the point:

    • Beyond Rhetoric: Metaphors are not just stylistic devices but stable linguistic and cognitive structures.

    • Mapping Meaning: Two key metaphorical processes link concrete and abstract concepts in a structured network.

    • Broad Impact: Findings have implications for linguistics, philosophy, AI, and the mathematics of cognition.

    Metaphors are a fundamental aspect of human language and cognition, allowing us to understand complex concepts and relationships by mapping them onto more familiar and concrete domains. However, the nature of metaphors and how they work is still not well understood. In a new recent paper, published in PLOS Complex Systems, Max-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences researchers Marie Teich and Wilmer Leal together with director Jürgen Jost have developed a formal framework and large-scale empirical methodology to analyze metaphors and their role in conceptual metaphor theory.

    Key Findings

    The study confirms the fundamental assumption in conceptual metaphor theory that metaphors are enduring linguistic and cognitive structures, not merely rhetorical figures. Using complex systems tools, the researchers identified a metaphor network with distinctions between abstract and concrete categories, and two significant metaphorical processes: mappings from concrete to abstract topics and the emergence of new mappings between concrete domains. The study also found that metaphors concentrate on two small sets of everyday topics, with one within the concrete group serving as both strong source and target domains, and the other in the abstract group primarily acting as targets. These findings indicate that metaphor is a creative process driven by contrast and tension between topics which allow re-conceptualizations and the emergence of new similarities.

    Implications and Future Research Directions

    The study's findings have significant implications for researchers in cognitive linguistics and the philosophy of language, particularly those focused on conceptual metaphor theory, figurative language, and semantic structure. The large-scale empirical methodology proposed by the authors can be used to do fundamental research in Conceptual Metaphor Theory providing new insights into the nature of metaphor and figurative thinking.

    Beyond the humanities, this work opens interesting research questions for machine learning and artificial intelligence, particularly in areas concerned with analogy and representation learning. The methods also hold promise for the mathematics of cognition and formal epistemology, offering tools to study how abstract meaning arises from structure-preserving mappings across conceptual domains.


    Contact for scientific information:

    Dr. Marie Teich, The American University Kyiv marie.teich@auk.edu.ua

    Dr. Wilmer Leal, University of Florida wleal@ufl.edu

    Prof. Dr. Jürgen Jost,
    Max -Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften, Leipzig jjost@mis.mpg.de


    Original publication:

    Teich, Marie; Leal, Wilmer; and Jost, Jürgen (2025) Diachronic data analysis supports and refines conceptual metaphor theory, PLOS Complex Systems, 2 (8): e0000058
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000058


    Images

    Hierarchical representation of semantic roles in the metaphor network.
    Hierarchical representation of semantic roles in the metaphor network.

    Copyright: © Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences


    Criteria of this press release:
    Journalists, Scientists and scholars, Students, Teachers and pupils
    Language / literature, Mathematics, Social studies
    transregional, national
    Research results
    English


     

    Help

    Search / advanced search of the idw archives
    Combination of search terms

    You can combine search terms with and, or and/or not, e.g. Philo not logy.

    Brackets

    You can use brackets to separate combinations from each other, e.g. (Philo not logy) or (Psycho and logy).

    Phrases

    Coherent groups of words will be located as complete phrases if you put them into quotation marks, e.g. “Federal Republic of Germany”.

    Selection criteria

    You can also use the advanced search without entering search terms. It will then follow the criteria you have selected (e.g. country or subject area).

    If you have not selected any criteria in a given category, the entire category will be searched (e.g. all subject areas or all countries).