A new study provides insights into the structural and cognitive dimensions of metaphors, revealing how they shape our thinking and language – far beyond their role as rhetorical devices. The article was recently published in PLOS Complex Systems.
To the point:
• Beyond Rhetoric: Metaphors are not just stylistic devices but stable linguistic and cognitive structures.
• Mapping Meaning: Two key metaphorical processes link concrete and abstract concepts in a structured network.
• Broad Impact: Findings have implications for linguistics, philosophy, AI, and the mathematics of cognition.
Metaphors are a fundamental aspect of human language and cognition, allowing us to understand complex concepts and relationships by mapping them onto more familiar and concrete domains. However, the nature of metaphors and how they work is still not well understood. In a new recent paper, published in PLOS Complex Systems, Max-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences researchers Marie Teich and Wilmer Leal together with director Jürgen Jost have developed a formal framework and large-scale empirical methodology to analyze metaphors and their role in conceptual metaphor theory.
Key Findings
The study confirms the fundamental assumption in conceptual metaphor theory that metaphors are enduring linguistic and cognitive structures, not merely rhetorical figures. Using complex systems tools, the researchers identified a metaphor network with distinctions between abstract and concrete categories, and two significant metaphorical processes: mappings from concrete to abstract topics and the emergence of new mappings between concrete domains. The study also found that metaphors concentrate on two small sets of everyday topics, with one within the concrete group serving as both strong source and target domains, and the other in the abstract group primarily acting as targets. These findings indicate that metaphor is a creative process driven by contrast and tension between topics which allow re-conceptualizations and the emergence of new similarities.
Implications and Future Research Directions
The study's findings have significant implications for researchers in cognitive linguistics and the philosophy of language, particularly those focused on conceptual metaphor theory, figurative language, and semantic structure. The large-scale empirical methodology proposed by the authors can be used to do fundamental research in Conceptual Metaphor Theory providing new insights into the nature of metaphor and figurative thinking.
Beyond the humanities, this work opens interesting research questions for machine learning and artificial intelligence, particularly in areas concerned with analogy and representation learning. The methods also hold promise for the mathematics of cognition and formal epistemology, offering tools to study how abstract meaning arises from structure-preserving mappings across conceptual domains.
Dr. Marie Teich, The American University Kyiv marie.teich@auk.edu.ua
Dr. Wilmer Leal, University of Florida wleal@ufl.edu
Prof. Dr. Jürgen Jost,
Max -Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften, Leipzig jjost@mis.mpg.de
Teich, Marie; Leal, Wilmer; and Jost, Jürgen (2025) Diachronic data analysis supports and refines conceptual metaphor theory, PLOS Complex Systems, 2 (8): e0000058
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000058
Hierarchical representation of semantic roles in the metaphor network.
Copyright: © Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
Journalisten, Lehrer/Schüler, Studierende, Wissenschaftler
Gesellschaft, Mathematik, Sprache / Literatur
überregional
Forschungsergebnisse
Englisch
Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.
Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).
Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.
Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).
Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).