idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instanz:
Teilen: 
07.02.2025 11:15

War and Redistribution – Experimental Study on Russia

Ressort Presse Ressort Presse - Stabsstelle des Rektorats
Universität Duisburg-Essen

    Wars bring suffering and destruction. They also cost a lot of money. What do the people of a warring country think about rising spending and government redistribution policies? Political scientists Dr. Philipp Chapkovski (University of Duisburg-Essen) and Alexei Zakharov (Ph.D, Yale University) have investigated this question in a survey experiment for Russia. Their study The Effect of War on Redistribution Preferences was published in the Journal of Public Economics.

    History shows that in times of war, it is easier for a government to implement lasting political changes, such as restructuring the welfare state. This is partly due to the so-called rally-round-the-flag effect: in crisis situations, citizens tend to support their political leaders and put personal interests aside in favor of national cohesion.

    Dr. Philipp Chapkovski, a researcher at the University of Duisburg-Essen (UDE), and his colleague from Yale have examined this effect for autocratic Russia. They conducted a survey experiment with almost 4,000 participants, partially influencing them with subtle references to the war in Ukraine. The aim was to find out whether the respondents would change their views on government spending and measures to reduce the income gap in the country.

    “We collected our data in December 2022 in Russia online via the crowdsourcing platform Toloka. Interestingly, we were among the last researchers to collect this type of politically sensitive data before Toloka tightened its censorship rules and now filters out survey content related to politics,” said Chapkovski.

    War, trust and social inequality

    In the two-part survey experiment, the two scientists asked, among other things, whether the respondents supported the annexation of the Ukrainian territories; whether they believed in victory; to what extent they thought the West was responsible for the conflict; and whether they were following the military operations. Further questions concerned the costs of the conflict, conscription into the army, the use of nuclear weapons, and the economic situation. Another block of questions covered social issues such as aid for the poor, housing and income inequality, and trust in the government: Are taxpayers' money being spent efficiently, do people trust President Putin, the regional governors and the police?

    The fact that some of the participants were initially asked about the war was noticeable in the answers. The supporters of the war showed the rally-round-the-flag effect: they trusted the government more and said “yes” to more state redistribution. Among the opponents of the war, it was exactly the opposite: when they were reminded of the potential costs of the conflict, for example, they supported the social redistribution measures less and also viewed the state organs more critically.

    “When our experiment took place, Russia had only a few deaths to mourn and the economic consequences of the war were not felt,” Philipp Chapkovski points out. ”Nevertheless, our results suggest that costly wars could deepen disagreements over government spending. This will also be an issue for future studies.”


    Wissenschaftliche Ansprechpartner:

    Dr. Philipp Chapkovski, Empirical Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, tel. +49 (0)203/37 9-2245, filipp.chapkovskii@uni-due.de


    Originalpublikation:

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272724002202


    Bilder

    Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
    Journalisten, Wissenschaftler
    Gesellschaft, Politik
    überregional
    Forschungsergebnisse, Forschungsprojekte
    Englisch


     

    Hilfe

    Die Suche / Erweiterte Suche im idw-Archiv
    Verknüpfungen

    Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.

    Klammern

    Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).

    Wortgruppen

    Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.

    Auswahlkriterien

    Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).

    Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).