idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
have to be made about how the land should be used in the future. Sustainable management strategies adapted to the region can help to incorporate the needs of local people and at the same time preserve the ecosystem services and ecosystem functioning of the savanna, as shown in a study led by the University of Potsdam.
There are conflicting ideas about the development of rural Africa: On the one hand, governments and conservation organizations want to protect savanna ecosystems in order to preserve the habitat and migration areas of wildlife such as elephants and lions. On the other hand, the local population's food supply is based on farming, meaning that their future livelihood can only be secured through expanding or intensifying agriculture – also as a result of climate change. As drylands are the largest terrestrial carbon sink, these visions of the future have a significant impact on global carbon storage. “However, the storage potential of savannas has not yet been sufficiently researched and their carbon dynamics with regard to disturbance factors such as browsing by elephants, woodcutting and livestock herding are poorly understood,” says leading author Dr. Liana Kindermann.
She and her team developed a method to estimate carbon storage in such disturbed ecosystems and quantified the carbon in trees, shrubs and their roots as well as the organic carbon in the soil. “We take a look at a few representative locations to see how today's land-use decisions could change the entire landscape in the future. We process this data with powerful statistical models to assess the impact of future land-use change on above-ground carbon and carbon storage across the entire ecosystem,” Liana Kindermann says. “Our results show that the vulnerability of carbon reservoirs to disturbance varies greatly depending on the land-use scenario,” she emphasizes.
With increasing wildlife density, aboveground carbon storage in shrubs and trees decreases by an average of 14 to 55 percent; with agriculture, the carbon loss is as high as 73 to 94 percent compared to sites with little disturbance. The organic carbon content in the soil can actually be increased through disturbances, especially when herbivores such as elephants feed on aboveground vegetation and thus redistribute carbon into the soil. However, this process is limited and can only work as long as the vegetation remains stable and is not destroyed by excessive wildlife densities. The carbon content in the soil is important for agricultural use. This is also evident from the observation that agricultural areas were primarily created where the soils already contained more carbon.
Decisions on how the land area is to be used in the future – also in terms of wildlife conservation – change the functions and ecosystem services of the savanna. “Occasional and localized disturbance of vegetation by large browsing wildlife species and livestock grazing has a positive effect on carbon storage in the savanna if the vegetation is allowed to recover. Extreme interventions such as large-scale deforestation for agriculture, but also chronically high wildlife densities, disbalance the carbon cycle and are detrimental to environmental protection and people's livelihoods. Sustainable strategies for future land-use therefore require transparent consideration of such trade-offs and sustainable solutions for everyone,” summarizes Kindermann.
Image 1: Increase or decrease of aboveground (AGC) and belowground carbon (BGC) in woody vegetation and soil organic carbon (SOC) according to different land-use change pathways. Image: Liana Kindermann.
Image 2: Governments and conservation organizations aim at protection of savanna ecosystems in order to preserve the habitat of African wildlife species such as elephants. Image: Liana Kindermann.
Contact:
Dr. Liana Kindermann
Institute of Biochemistry and Biology
Tel.: +49 (0) 331 977-1904
E-Mail: liana.kindermann@uni-potsdam.de
Link to Publication: Kindermann, L., Sandhage-Hofmann, A., Amelung, W., Börner, J., Dobler, M., Fabiano, E. C., Meyer, M., Linstädter, A., 2025, Natural and human disturbances have non-linear effects on whole-ecosystem carbon storage in an African savanna, Global Change Biology, Volume 31, Issue 4, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70163
Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
Journalisten, jedermann
Biologie, Chemie, Umwelt / Ökologie
überregional
Forschungsergebnisse
Englisch
Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.
Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).
Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.
Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).
Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).
