Mining in Brazil does not deliver the sustained economic benefits often claimed, while informal mining is a major driver of deforestation, especially in the Amazon. A new study offers one of the most comprehensive assessments to date, combining satellite imagery and economic data to analyze the environmental and economic impacts of mining at the municipal scale across Brazil.
Despite its reputation as a catalyst for economic development, there is surprisingly little evidence on how mining affects local economies, or how those impacts balance against environmental costs. This question is particularly pressing in Brazil, a country that is both a global mining hub and home to some of the world’s most important ecosystems.
The study, published in Nature Communications by researchers from IIASA, the Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), and the University of São Paulo, Brazil, compared the effects of large-scale industrial mining operations with informal small-scale, or garimpo, mining. While there are case studies on individual mines, this study took a nationwide view looking at over 5,000 municipalities, tracking the economic and environmental effects of mining over time and across neighboring areas. The authors combined satellite data with official economic statistics to get a full picture.
“Mining is frequently promoted by political and business leaders as a pathway to prosperity, but we found that the reality on the ground is much more complex and often disappointing,” explains lead author Sebastian Luckeneder, a researcher at the Institute for Ecological Economics at the Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU). “Our results show that in many cases, the economic boost is short-lived and comes at the cost of lasting environmental damage.”
While industrial mining is large-scale and operated by companies with heavy machinery and legal permits, garimpo mining is often unregulated or illegal, and especially prevalent in the Amazon region. The results show that garimpo mining is closely linked to deforestation, while industrial mining did not show a strong connection to forest loss. However, when it comes to economic outcomes, neither model delivered steady, long-term improvements.
“Although industrial mining sometimes brings short-term economic growth, these benefits often disappear within a few years. In some regions, we even observed signs of economic decline, both in mining areas and in neighboring municipalities,” says coauthor Juliana Siqueira-Gay from the University of São Paulo.
“We were surprised to see how quickly the economic benefits of industrial mining faded when global commodity prices dropped,” adds coauthor Victor Maus, a researcher in the Novel Data Ecosystems for Sustainability Research Group of the IIASA Advancing Systems Analysis Program. “Even neighboring regions showed signs of decline, which raises serious concerns about over-reliance on mining as a development strategy.”
The findings challenge the prevailing assumption that mining automatically boosts local economies.
“Our findings challenge the idea that mining is a reliable engine for local development,” notes Tamás Krisztin, another coauthor and senior research scholar in the Integrated Biosphere Futures Research Group of the IIASA Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program. “Economic benefits mainly occurred before 2010. Environmental costs, particularly from informal mining, were initially high, then temporarily eased, but have resurged in more recent years.”
The authors emphasize that how mining is managed makes a critical difference. They urge policymakers to bring informal mining under stricter legal regulation, enforce robust environmental and social safeguards, and closely monitor activities, especially in vulnerable ecosystems like the Amazon. In regions where responsible oversight is not possible, they suggest that mining should be restricted altogether.
“Mining will remain necessary for supplying raw materials, but we must stop treating it as a silver bullet for economic development. We need to prioritize resource efficiency, invest in recycling, and ensure mining only happens when it clearly serves the broader public good, economically, socially, and environmentally,” concludes IIASA Economic Frontiers Program Director, Michael Kuhn, who was also a study coauthor.
The study was partly conducted during the 2021 IIASA Young Scientists Summer Program (YSSP) as part of Luckeneder’s YSSP project.
Reference
Luckeneder, S., Maus, V., Siqueira-Gay, J., Krisztin, T. & Kuhn, M. (2025). Forest loss and uncertain economic gains from industrial and garimpo mining in Brazilian municipalities. Nature Communications DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61930-8
About IIASA:
The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) is an international scientific institute that conducts research into the critical issues of global environmental, economic, technological, and social change that we face in the twenty-first century. Our findings provide valuable options to policymakers to shape the future of our changing world. IIASA is independent and funded by prestigious research funding agencies in Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe. www.iiasa.ac.at
Researcher contact
Sebastian Luckeneder
Institute for Ecological Economics
Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU)
sebastian.luckeneder@wu.ac.at
Victor Maus
Guest Research Scholar
Novel Data Ecosystems for Sustainability Research Group
Advancing Systems Analysis Program
maus@iiasa.ac.at
Tamás Krisztin
Senior Research Scholar
Integrated Biosphere Futures Research Group
Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program
krisztin@iiasa.ac.at
Michael Kuhn
Program Director and Principal Research Scholar
Economic Frontiers Program
kuhn@iiasa.ac.at
Juliana Siqueira-Gay
Escola Politécnica
University of São Paulo
juliana.siqueira@usp.br
Press Officer
Ansa Heyl
IIASA Press Office
Tel: +43 2236 807 574
Mob: +43 676 83 807 574
heyl@iiasa.ac.at
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61930-8
https://iiasa.ac.at/news/jul-2025/exploring-economic-promise-and-environmental-c...
Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
Journalisten, jedermann
Tier / Land / Forst, Umwelt / Ökologie
überregional
Forschungsergebnisse
Englisch
Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.
Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).
Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.
Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).
Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).