idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instanz:
Teilen: 
31.07.2025 11:03

Climate-protecting carbon sinks of EU forests are declining

Dr. Eberhard Fritz Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie

    Forests cover around 40 percent of the EU's land area. Between 1990 and 2022, they absorbed around 10 percent of the continent's man-made carbon emissions. However, the carbon dioxide absorption capacity of forests, also known as carbon sinks, is becoming increasingly weaker. This is shown by calculations of multi-year carbon budgets by an international team of researchers in a recent Nature study. The continuous decline in the carbon sink of our forests jeopardizes the EU's climate targets. To halt or reverse the trend, the authors recommend practical measures in research and forest management.

    Forests absorb carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere, which they use for their metabolism and convert into biomass. Healthy and growing forests therefore act as carbon sinks, storing climate-damaging CO₂ from the atmosphere in the long term. Forests are the strongest natural carbon sink on land in the EU, but this function is under threat: between 2020 and 2022, the average carbon sink decreased by around 27 percent compared to the average value for the years 2010 to 2014. This is according to the EU greenhouse gas inventory published by the European Environment Agency in 2024. The new figures for 2025 paint an even bleaker picture, with an even greater decline in the sink. If the trend continues, the EU will miss its target set in Regulation 2018/841 to save an additional 42 million tons of CO₂ equivalents by 2030 compared to the average for the period 2018 to 2020.

    Causes of declining carbon uptake:

    Between 1950 and 2020, EU forests more than doubled their biomass and roughly tripled their carbon sequestration capacity. This was due, among other things, to reforestation after the war years, improved forest management, new energy sources replacing wood, and increased nitrogen inputs.
    The decline in carbon uptake now being measured has several causes. Timber harvesting has increased and climate change is leading to more frequent heat waves and droughts, which are impairing plant growth. This has reduced the biomass of trees and thus their capacity to absorb carbon dioxide. Climate change is also making sporadic threats to forests from insect infestations, storms, tree dieback, and forest fires more frequent and more severe. This is exacerbated by the fact that EU forests are not very resilient: around 30 percent consist of monocultures, which are more susceptible to climatic influences and pests.
    These factors place a significant strain on forests in the EU and thus on their function as carbon sinks. “Our research has been warning about these effects of climate change and climate extremes since the heatwave of 2003. Now it has been confirmed: they not only affect ecosystems in the short term, but also weaken the carbon uptake of our forests in the long term,” comments Prof. Markus Reichstein from the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany, who was significantly involved in the study. However, a weakening of carbon uptake is also occurring in other forests around the world, as research at the Max Planck Institute has shown for tropical forests in the Amazon.

    Recommended actions:

    The consequences of climate change on carbon sinks require countermeasures on several levels: reducing greenhouse gas emissions, managing forests to make them more resilient to future climate conditions and extreme weather events, and adapting timber harvesting practices. In addition, we need better and more timely monitoring of all carbon stocks and of the health of our forests. These measurements should provide reliable data to develop the necessary policy and practical measures to restore forest carbon sinks and maximize their resilience. “However, relying solely on natural carbon sinks is risky. Rather, those who reduce emissions will be rewarded many times over – with fewer climate extremes and, as a result, forests that can once again bind more carbon,” concludes Reichstein.

    The study outlines specific measures in the areas of forest monitoring, modeling, and forest management to prevent the decline of the forest carbon sink. Implementing these measures could advance the EU's 2024 Renaturation Act, several EU regulations, and its climate neutrality goal. In addition to calling for integrated measures, the study presents an accompanying research roadmap as a guide for the necessary policy decisions. If timely regulations are combined with incentives for sustainable practices, the EU can still reverse the decline of its forests and maintain its expected contribution to climate neutrality by 2050.


    Wissenschaftliche Ansprechpartner:

    Prof. Dr. Markus Reichstein
    Managing Director
    Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
    Jena, Germany
    phone: +49 3641 57-6200 / -7200
    email: reichstein-office@bgc-jena.mpg.de


    Originalpublikation:

    Migliavacca, M., Grassi, G., Bastos, A. et al. Securing the forest carbon sink for the European Union’s climate ambition. Nature 643, 1203–1213 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08967-3


    Weitere Informationen:

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08967-3 link to original publication
    https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgi link to Reichstein department


    Bilder

    Pine Forest in Lithuania
    Pine Forest in Lithuania
    Quelle: Antonio Jordan
    Copyright: Antonio Jordán via imaggeo.egu.eu


    Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
    Journalisten, jedermann
    Geowissenschaften, Meer / Klima, Tier / Land / Forst, Umwelt / Ökologie
    überregional
    Forschungsergebnisse
    Englisch


     

    Pine Forest in Lithuania


    Zum Download

    x

    Hilfe

    Die Suche / Erweiterte Suche im idw-Archiv
    Verknüpfungen

    Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.

    Klammern

    Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).

    Wortgruppen

    Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.

    Auswahlkriterien

    Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).

    Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).