idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
Nachrichten, Termine, Experten
An international research team, including experts from the Ecological-Botanical Garden (ÖBG) at the University of Bayreuth, has demonstrated in a new study that native tree species in Argentina grow at a similar rate to introduced North American pine species—contrary to previous assumptions. Moreover, the exotic pines displace native trees and increase the risk of forest fires, especially in the context of climate change. The researchers published their findings in the journal Forest Ecology and Management.
---
Why it matters
Non-native plant species are often introduced and cultivated with the expectation of faster growth or higher yields. While the cultivation of exotic crops may be economically attractive, it frequently carries ecological risks: introduced species can displace native plants, alter soil chemistry, and disrupt entire ecosystems. Studies such as the one involving the ÖBG at the University of Bayreuth help to understand the impacts of exotic cultivation, counteract past forestry mistakes, and provide recommendations for forestry authorities, forest enterprises, and private woodland owners to promote climate-resilient forests for the future.
---
Since the 1970s, North American pine species—believed to grow faster than native trees—have been planted in Argentina for timber production. As a result, exotic pines have displaced many native species such as the Coihue southern beech and the Chilean cedar, significantly altering the ecosystem. Until now, however, there has been a lack of research comparing the actual productivity of exotic pines with native tree species.
An international research team, including the ÖBG at the University of Bayreuth, has addressed this issue: for the first time, they systematically compared native and introduced species across multiple sites in different climate zones of Argentina. “This approach allows our study to produce findings that are not limited to a single location but can be generalised,” says Dr Robert Weigel, Executive Director of the ÖBG.
To compare the growth dynamics of introduced and native trees, the researchers analysed tree rings using core samples, which reveal insights into climatic conditions based on their width. The first 32 years of growth were of particular interest, as they represent the so-called “stem exclusion phase”—a period marked by intense competition for sunlight, water, and nutrients, during which less competitive plants die off. The researchers also used stable isotope analysis to examine water loss and associated drought stress during this phase.
“The assumption that introduced pine species grow faster and are therefore more productive for timber could not be confirmed by our tree ring analysis,” says Weigel. On the contrary, the pines displace native species and increase the risk of forest fires due to their dense needle litter—especially during periods of drought and climate stress. The isotope analysis also indicated greater water loss and overall higher water consumption by the introduced pines, which is problematic in the face of climate change.
“Our findings highlight that non-native species should only be introduced into existing systems after careful consideration. We recommend prioritising native tree species in future reforestation efforts and reducing the expansion of pine plantations in northern Patagonia,” Weigel concludes.
The study was funded by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food.
Dr. Robert Weigel
Executive Director of the Ecological-Botanical Garden
University of Bayreuth
Tel.: +49 (0)921 / 55-2960
E-Mail: robert.weigel@uni-bayreuth.de
Ernesto Juan Reiter, Robert Weigel et al. Exotic pine plantations vs. native forests in northern Patagonia: Comparing growth patterns and climate change vulnerability. Forest Ecology and Management (2025)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122966
Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
Journalisten, Wissenschaftler
Biologie, Tier / Land / Forst, Umwelt / Ökologie
überregional
Forschungsergebnisse
Englisch
Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.
Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).
Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.
Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).
Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).
