idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instanz:
Teilen: 
09.03.2026 11:00

Brain Activity Reveals How Well We Mentally Size Up Others

Nathalie Huber Kommunikation
Universität Zürich

    Humans often adapt their behavior to that of other people with lightning speed. A new study by the University of Zurich reveals what brain networks govern social mentalization and adaptation, making it possible to predict how flexibly one person reacts to others. The findings of the study could provide new approaches to gaining a better understanding of social disabilities such as autism spectrum disorder or borderline personality disorder.

    How quickly do we perceive whether a person we are interacting with is clever or predictable? Be it in a game, a conversation or a negotiation, we constantly infer what others are thinking and size up their intentions, and we adjust our behavior accordingly in a process that scientists call “adaptive mentalization.” A new study by the University of Zurich now reveals how our brains govern this adaptation.

    Differences in social mentalization
    A team of researchers led by Christian Ruff, a professor of neuroeconomics and decision neuroscience at the University of Zurich, examined the behavior of over 550 people in different game situations. The study subjects played a repeated rock-paper-scissors game against human or artificial opponents. With the aid of a novel computational model, the researchers quantified how strategically the subjects sized up their respective opponents and how much they adapted their estimation of them after each round. The study found that most of the subjects reacted flexibly when the opponent’s behavior changed, but there was a wide range of reaction flexibility between the participants in the study. “Some can do that very quickly – they are often good at recognizing what strategy their opponents are employing. Others take much longer to correctly infer their opponent’s behavior,” says Niklas Bürgi, co-first author of the study, formerly at the University of Zurich and now at the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics.

    Social brain network becomes active
    Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, the researchers were able to identify a distributed network encompassing several regions of the brain that shows increased activity whenever subjects rethink their estimation of their opponent. The temporoparietal cortex, which plays a vital role in contemplating the thoughts and intentions of others, is particularly important here, as is the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, which is involved in appraising social information. The anterior insula and adjacent areas of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex also exhibit a spike in activity, particularly when expectations turn out wrong and a reassessment becomes necessary. “In these moments, activity in those areas of the brain measurably changes,” explains Gökhan Aydogan, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Zurich’s Department of Economics.

    Social adaptation becomes predictable
    What matters is that these activity patterns make it possible to predict how much a person adapts their estimation. “This prediction worked even with subjects whose brain data had not yet been added to the model,” Ruff says. The researchers thus speak of a neural fingerprint of adaptive mentalization. Prediction was successful with almost 90% of the study participants.

    Previous research had examined social cognition mostly through static tasks such as short stories or single decisions. The new study, in contrast, utilized dynamic interactions that are more similar to those in everyday life. The study shows that mentalization is not a static state, but rather an ongoing adaptation process. “Our findings may help to apprehend social cognition abilities more objectively in the future,” Ruff says. This is particularly pertinent for neurological disorders such as autism or borderline personality disorder that hamper social interactions. “Neural markers of this kind may also help in the long run to evaluate and further develop therapies in a more targeted manner,” Ruff adds.

    Literature
    Niklas Buergi, Gökhan Aydogan, Arkady Konovalov, Christian C. Ruff. A neural fingerprint of adaptive mentalization. Nature Neuroscience. 9 March 2026. Doi: 10.1038/s41593-026-02219-x

    Contact
    Christian Ruff
    Professor of Neuroeconomics and Decision Neuroscience
    University of Zurich
    Phone +41 44 634 50 67
    E-mail: christian.ruff@econ.uzh.ch


    Originalpublikation:

    Niklas Buergi, Gökhan Aydogan, Arkady Konovalov, Christian C. Ruff. A neural fingerprint of adaptive mentalization. Nature Neuroscience. 9 March 2026. Doi: 10.1038/s41593-026-02219-x


    Weitere Informationen:

    https://www.news.uzh.ch/en/articles/media/2026/mentalization.html


    Bilder

    Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
    Journalisten
    Gesellschaft, Psychologie, Wirtschaft
    überregional
    Forschungsergebnisse
    Englisch


     

    Hilfe

    Die Suche / Erweiterte Suche im idw-Archiv
    Verknüpfungen

    Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.

    Klammern

    Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).

    Wortgruppen

    Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.

    Auswahlkriterien

    Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).

    Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).