idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Grafik: idw-Logo

idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft

idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instanz:
Teilen: 
04.02.2008 21:47

Thinking too complicated?

Katrin Weigmann Press office
Bernstein Centers for Computational Neuroscience

    Neuronal activity is far more predictable than has until now been assumed

    How sensitive are neuronal networks to external interference? To what extent are neuronal network processes incudung the thinking patterns of the brain predefined? These questions have been investigated by Sven Jahnke, Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer and Marc Timme at the Bernstein Center for Computional Neuroscience and the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organisation. They have found out that, under certain conditions, neuronal networks are more predictable than was previously assumed (Physical Review Letters, Feb. 1st, 2008)

    The brain is one of the most complex objects evolution has created - more than 100 billion neurons communicate with one another through a widely branched network. Neurons process information represented as electrical impulses. Each cell computes the signals of the presynaptic cells. When it generates an impulse itself, depends on the result of this calculation. Marc Timme and collaborators have now mathematically analyzed such a system of neuronal signal transmission and have verified their theory by means of computer simulations. As in the brain, the dynamics of neuronal signal transmission in the mathematical model does not follow a recognizable order; the way in which neuronal impulses are transmitted appears to be unforeseeable. But how unpredictable is such a system really?

    Researchers call a system "chaotic" if slight differences in the initial states lead to very different outcomes after long times. The behavior of chaotic systems thus cannot be predicted in the long-term. "The beat of a butterfly's wing in the Amazon Jungle can cause a hurricane in Europe", as the mathematician and meteorologist Edward N. Lorenz visualized this effect in the 1960s. In 1996 researchers of the Hebrew University in Israel demonstrated in a theoretical study that the observed irregular neuronal activity of the brain may be explained by chaotic behavior. Thus, the network would develop a very different dynamics, even if only a single neuron transmitted a signal a fraction of a second earlier or later. In the last ten years many neuroscientists assumed that such chaotic behavior generally accounts for the observed irregularities.

    As Timme and colleagues have now uncovered, chaotic activity only arises under certain conditions and may not be a general rule in such networks. "A combination of various new methods has made it possible for us to consider every single impulse of a neuron in a network", Jahnke explains. The researchers could show that, under certain conditions, a neuronal network is astonishingly insensitive to small temporal shifts of neuronal impulses.
    "If patterns of neuronal activity are similar enough, they do not develop an entirely different dynamics, as would be expected from a chaotic system. Quite in contrast, they conform to one another in the long-term", Memmesheimer explains. In the brain this could contribute to the highly precise emergence of temporal activity patterns, so that information in such networks can be processed and calculated to a high accuracy.

    Although the network appears to be highly irregular according to statistical measures, this is not necessarily an indication of a chaotic system. Rather, it can be predictable over a longer period of time. "We still have to examine more closely the circumstances under which the brain's reaction is predicatble rather that chaotic", Timme adds. In any case, the dynamics of neuronal networks is, even though highly irregular, not always as complicated as previously thought.

    Original publication:
    Sven Jahnke, Raoul-Martin Memeshimer and Marc Timme (2007). Stable irregular dynamics in complex neural networks. Physical Review Letters 100, 048102. DOI: 10.113/PhysRevLett.100.048102

    Contact:
    Dr. Marc Timme
    Head of the
    Network Dynamics Group
    Max Planck Institut for Dynamics and Self-Organisation
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience
    Bunsenstr. 10
    37073 Göttingen
    Germany
    timme@nld.ds.mpg.de


    Weitere Informationen:

    http://www.nld.ds.mpg.de/~timme
    http://www.bernstein-zentren.de/
    http://www.bccn-goettingen.de/


    Bilder

    Highly irregular activity in neuronal networks. Top panel: Sequence of neuronal signals of 40 neurons belonging to a larger network. Bottom panel: complex temporal dynamic of a neuron and the impulses generated by it.
    Highly irregular activity in neuronal networks. Top panel: Sequence of neuronal signals of 40 neuron ...
    Quelle: Copyright: Sven Jahnke, Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer and Marc Timme, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization.

    Chaotic or stable network dynamics? For "chaotic" network dynamics, small disturbances in the sequence of neuronal impulses (red arrow) grow into larger discrepancies after some time (top panel, compare grey and black impulse sequences). However, model systems of neuronal networks in the brain react chaotically only under certain conditions. If they show "stable" behavior, small slightly different impulse sequences become more similar (bottom panel). Thus, a stable system is better predictable than a chaotic one.
    Chaotic or stable network dynamics? For "chaotic" network dynamics, small disturbances in the sequen ...
    Quelle: Copyright: Marc Timme, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization.


    Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
    Biologie, Ernährung / Gesundheit / Pflege, Informationstechnik, Mathematik, Medizin, Physik / Astronomie
    überregional
    Forschungsergebnisse, Wissenschaftliche Publikationen
    Englisch


     

    Hilfe

    Die Suche / Erweiterte Suche im idw-Archiv
    Verknüpfungen

    Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.

    Klammern

    Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).

    Wortgruppen

    Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.

    Auswahlkriterien

    Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).

    Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).