idw – Informationsdienst Wissenschaft

Nachrichten, Termine, Experten

Grafik: idw-Logo
Grafik: idw-Logo

idw - Informationsdienst
Wissenschaft

Science Video Project
idw-Abo

idw-News App:

AppStore

Google Play Store



Instanz:
Teilen: 
15.04.2025 10:11

Leopoldina discussion paper on the direct funding and evaluation of scientific journals

Julia Klabuhn Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina

    Access to scientific knowledge is essential for science, as well as for tackling societal challenges. However, the limitation of this access by paywalls comes at a cost to public finances and also, increasingly, to scientific quality. In light of this situation, the authors of a discussion paper published today by the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina propose a new funding principle for scientific journals that would make these publications freely available to everyone.

    Thus, a key aspect is for the funding of journals to follow the same procedure as publicly funded research. This would involve an application process to run a journal as well as regular evaluation. The aim is to guarantee lasting quality, transparency, and scientific relevance while also cutting costs.

    According to the authors, the publication of scientific journals is currently dominated by a handful of profit-oriented publishers. Income is derived from subscription contracts with libraries or by charging fees to publish articles, known as article processing charges (APCs). As funding for science and academic libraries is a public task, publishers’ profits ultimately come from public finances. Monopoly structures lacking sufficient market controls have arisen, which have made scientific publication much more expensive without adding scientific value. In order to correct this trend, according to the authors, scientific publication should be funded and monitored in the same way as research itself. Accordingly, they recommend establishing what is known as a diamond open access model, which ensures free access for both authors and readers. The running and the funding of journals that follow this model remain in the hands of expert scientific organisations or institutions that receive a budget for the purpose. This budget allows them to contract service providers in competitive procedures to fulfil certain publication components.

    Running a journal under the proposed funding system would be based on an application submitted by a scientific society, an academy, or a public institution with a scientific or infrastructural mission. The authors of the paper argue that the evaluation of such applications should follow the criteria established by those research or funding organisations that also organise the evaluation of research funding. For the next stage in implementing the proposed funding process, the discussion paper specifically recommends involving representatives from scientific societies that publish scientific journals, in order to better estimate the required budget and how to shape the application procedure. A national pilot project should be launched to test the new procedure. The experts also suggest initiating an international working group to establish supranational co-financing.

    The discussion paper “A New Concept for the Direct Funding and Evaluation of Scientific Journals” has been published on the Leopoldina website: https://www.leopoldina.org/en/publishing-funding

    Publications in the series “Leopoldina Discussion” are contributions by the authors named. With its discussion papers, the Academy offers researchers the opportunity to provide thought-provoking impulses, stimulate discourse and formulate recommendations flexibly and without a formal working group process. The theses and recommendations contained in discussion papers thus do not reflect the official positions of the Leopoldina.

    The discussion paper was written by members of the working group “The future of scientific publishing”. The working group includes experts from the fields of physics, chemistry, biochemistry, mathematics, electrochemistry, materials science, evolutionary biology, bioinformatics, history, scientific research, ecology, and economics. The working group spokesperson is Professor Dr Diethard Tautz. About the working group: https://www.leopoldina.org/en/policy-advice/working-groups/the-future-of-scienti...

    The Leopoldina on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/leopoldina.org

    The Leopoldina on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@nationalakademieleopoldina

    The Leopoldina on X: https://www.twitter.com/leopoldina

    About the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina:
    As the German National Academy of Sciences, the Leopoldina provides independent science-based policy advice on matters relevant to society. To this end, the Academy develops interdisciplinary statements based on scientific findings. In these publications, options for action are outlined; making decisions, however, is the responsibility of democratically legitimized politicians. The experts who prepare the statements work in a voluntary and unbiased manner. The Leopoldina represents the German scientific community in the international academy dialogue. This includes advising the annual summits of Heads of State and Government of the G7 and G20 countries. With around 1,700 members from more than 30 countries, the Leopoldina combines expertise from almost all research areas. Founded in 1652, it was appointed the National Academy of Sciences of Germany in 2008. The Leopoldina is committed to the common good.

    Media Contact:
    Julia Klabuhn
    Acting Head of the Press and Public Relations Department
    Tel: +49 (0)345 472 39-800
    Email: presse@leopoldina.org


    Weitere Informationen:

    https://www.leopoldina.org/en/leopoldina-home/


    Bilder

    Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
    Journalisten, Wissenschaftler
    fachunabhängig
    überregional
    Wissenschaftspolitik
    Englisch


     

    Hilfe

    Die Suche / Erweiterte Suche im idw-Archiv
    Verknüpfungen

    Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.

    Klammern

    Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).

    Wortgruppen

    Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.

    Auswahlkriterien

    Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).

    Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).