Public life and economic activity was reduced to a minimum as part of measures to tackle the coronavirus pandemic, which changed the demand on the energy market. Energy consumption and CO2 emissions fell sharply to levels never seen before in times of peace. This reduction, however, was not constant in all regions, as CO2 emissions in Europe fell lower than those in other regions on the planet. Economists at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and in Switzerland are have been investigating how the reduction in demand for energy affected CO2 emission levels in Europe.
During the entire lockdown, the demand for electricity fell by up to 19 percent and CO2 emissions even fell by 34 percent per hour. This data from 16 EU states and Great Britain was collected and evaluated for the time between January and March 2020. The researchers discovered significant differences. The drop in CO2 emissions in various countries varied greatly, depending on which source of energy suffered the drop in demand and how intense the ‘demand shock’ was.
The countries where the reduction in CO2 emissions was most noticeable were those whose energy supply heavily relies on coal. These include Poland and Great Britain, but also Germany. If the certificates that must be purchased for increased CO2 emissions are expensive, the drop in demand ensures that the more expensive ‘dirty’ electricity is replaced by alternative energy sources on the market. As the coronavirus pandemic spread across Europe at the beginning of last year, the price of these certificates was high and less electricity was being generated using coal, which led to a significant drop in CO2 emissions.
In countries without high prices for CO2, gas as a source of energy for electricity production was pushed out of the market. This resulted in a lower drop in CO2 emissions as gas produces less CO2 than coal. ‘Our research demonstrates that the reduction in emissions caused by a reduction in energy demand is significantly higher in cases where an appropriate price for CO2 is used than in cases where no CO2 pricing or low CO2 pricing is in place,’ explains Prof. Liebensteiner.
It is feasible that the reduction in CO2 emissions will only last for as long as it takes for the economy to recover from the pandemic, as was the case during the global financial crisis in 2009. Even though there was a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions, no structural changes have been made towards lower carbon content energy sources. The researchers have published their findings in the journal Energy Policy*. ‘Our results demonstrate that a sufficiently high price for emissions would immediately increase the efficacy of measures to improve energy efficiency,’ says Prof. Liebensteiner. ‘In the long term, this could herald structural change in electricity supply by means of incentives for investments in technologies that produce fewer emissions.’
Prof. Dr. Mario Liebensteiner
Assistant Professorship for Energy Markets and Energy Systems Analysis
Phone: +49 911 5302 96204
Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung:
Umwelt / Ökologie, Verkehr / Transport, Wirtschaft
Sie können Suchbegriffe mit und, oder und / oder nicht verknüpfen, z. B. Philo nicht logie.
Verknüpfungen können Sie mit Klammern voneinander trennen, z. B. (Philo nicht logie) oder (Psycho und logie).
Zusammenhängende Worte werden als Wortgruppe gesucht, wenn Sie sie in Anführungsstriche setzen, z. B. „Bundesrepublik Deutschland“.
Die Erweiterte Suche können Sie auch nutzen, ohne Suchbegriffe einzugeben. Sie orientiert sich dann an den Kriterien, die Sie ausgewählt haben (z. B. nach dem Land oder dem Sachgebiet).
Haben Sie in einer Kategorie kein Kriterium ausgewählt, wird die gesamte Kategorie durchsucht (z.B. alle Sachgebiete oder alle Länder).